Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to Guide Personalized Embryo Transfer with Conventional Frozen Embryo Transfer in 281 Chinese Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Yan Jia; Yulin Sha; Zhu Qiu; Yanhua Guo; Aixiang Tan; Yan Huang; Ying Zhong; Yajun Dong; Hongxia Ye

doi:10.12659/MSM.935634

22 March 2022: Clinical Research

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to Guide Personalized Embryo Transfer with Conventional Frozen Embryo Transfer in 281 Chinese Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Yan Jia ^1BCDEF , Yulin Sha ^12BF , Zhu Qiu ^1BCD , Yanhua Guo ^1CE , Aixiang Tan ^1EF , Yan Huang ^1EF , Ying Zhong ^1EF , Yajun Dong ^1ADF* , Hongxia Ye ^1ADG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935634

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935634

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

View HTML version

Figure 1 Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) assessment of endometrial receptivity in 140 Chinese women with recurrent implantation failure. Pre-receptive profile, P+6; early receptive, P+5.5; late receptive profile, P+4.5; P – progesterone. The figure was created using Microsoft Excel 2010.

Back to the Article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to Guide Personalized Embryo Transfer with Conventional Frozen Embryo Transfer in 281 Chinese Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Your Privacy