Modified Mylohyoid Nerve Anesthesia/Block With 4% Articaine and Dexamethasone Versus Halstead’s IANB With 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular Molar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes

Kristina Burić; Simona Stojanović; Miloš Tijanic; Nikola Burić

doi:10.12659/MSM.951821

03 June 2026 : Clinical Research

Modified Mylohyoid Nerve Anesthesia/Block With 4% Articaine and Dexamethasone Versus Halstead’s IANB With 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular Molar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes

Kristina Burić^{ABE 1*}, Simona Stojanović^{C 1}, Miloš Tijanic^{CD 1}, Nikola Burić^{BE 2}

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951821

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e951821

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Figure 2 3D CBCT (cone beam CT) roentgen anatomy of the lingual side of the mandible, with the white triangle pointing to the needle’s tip at the desired site of injection and deposition of anesthetics with the MMA technique.

Back to the Article

Modified Mylohyoid Nerve Anesthesia/Block With 4% Articaine and Dexamethasone Versus Halstead’s IANB With 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular Molar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes

Your Privacy