Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

17 May 2024: Clinical Research  

Impact of Cluster Nursing Intervention on ICU Patients’ Psychological Well-Being and Complications Associated with Tracheal Intubation and Extubation

Xuezhong Yi1ABCE, Junjun Li1BCD, Yuyou Huang1CF, Ran Liu1CEF, Zhiyuan Zhong1AEF*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942855

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942855

0 Comments

Abstract

0:00

BACKGROUND: Nurses in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) play a critical role in recognizing patients who are at risk of deterioration by conducting continual assessments and taking suitable measures in response to changing health status. The validity of the cluster nursing intervention has been studied previously, but its use among ICU patients with tracheal intubation and extubation has not been examined. This study assessed the effectiveness of cluster nursing intervention in ICU patients with tracheal intubation and extubation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 80 patients on mechanical ventilation in the ICU ward were randomly assigned to control and intervention groups (40 patients each). The control group received the routine nursing mode, while the intervention group was given 5 sessions of cluster nursing intervention. Tracheal intubation and extubation-associated complications, blood gas analysis, patient nursing satisfaction, and changes in patients' negative emotions were compared before and after the intervention.

RESULTS: After the nursing intervention, the levels of PaO2 were higher, while PaCO2 levels were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (P<0.05). Importantly, anxiety and depression scores in the intervention group were lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the overall incidence of complications in the intervention group was lower than in the control group, whereas patient satisfaction with nursing services was higher (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Cluster nursing intervention can effectively reduce the incidence of complications and improve patients’ physiological and psychological conditions. Moreover, it enhances patient satisfaction with nursing services, thus improving patients' clinical symptoms.

Keywords: Intensive Care Units, Airway Extubation, Intubation, Intratracheal, Critical Care Nursing, Psychology

Introduction

The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a special area for critically ill patients. Mechanical ventilation is widely used in the ICU [1], which is an important means to rescue patients with respiratory arrest or respiratory failure. Orotracheal intubation is the most commonly used emergency respiratory method for invasive mechanical ventilation [2]. As soon as the underlying condition that eventually requires mechanical ventilation is stabilized and the patient can sustain spontaneous breathing and appropriate oxygenation and ventilation, extubation and rapid liberation from mechanical ventilation are critical. Complications that can arise after extubation include laryngeal spasm, asphyxia, bronchospasm, cough, and hypoxemia. These complications can be caused by long-term compression of the oropharyngeal, tracheal mucosa, and vocal cord by a catheter or airbag, secondary infection in the dead space above the airbag, or aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions or vomit into the trachea and lungs due to airbag leakage [3]. In addition, tracheal extubation can even induce heart failure and cardiac arrest, which is associated with high mortality rates of 25–50% [4].

Extubation is a critical decision in the ICU since mortality is particularly high when extubation fails, thus resulting in re-intubation [5,6]. The general rate of re-intubation following planned extubation is about 10%, but it can be as high as 20% in particular patient subgroups [7]. Identification of patients at high risk of re-intubation warrants consideration to of specific procedures that can prevent the need for re-intubation [8].

Intensive care nursing focuses on all aspects of basic nursing care and life support. It combines the essence of nursing with observation, insightful and even intuitive interpretation, and responses to even the slightest change in a patient’s condition [9]. The cluster nursing intervention combines evidence-based medical theory with nursing interventions to deliver centralized and focused patient care in light of the rapidly developing field of evidence-based medicine and the introduction of novel nursing concepts [10,11]. Cluster nursing intervention is a well-established concept. Previously, it was reported that clustering care interventions can dramatically lower stroke patients’ anxiety levels and have a major impact on neurological recovery in ICU stroke patients [12]. Moreover, it has been shown that cluster nursing intervention can effectively reduce negative emotions such as depression and anxiety in ICU patients with delirium [13]. Similarly, Huang et al [14] demonstrated that cluster nursing intervention could lessen the occurrence of delirium, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stays, and improve the prognosis of patients. However, it has not been reported whether the cluster nursing intervention can prevent complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation and reduce patients’ negative emotions. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine the clinical effectiveness of cluster nursing intervention in ICU patients with tracheal intubation and extubation.

Material and Methods

PARTICIPANTS:

In this retrospective study, from June 2019 to December 2020, 80 patients with mechanical ventilation in the ICU of our hospital were randomly divided into control and intervention groups using a computer-generated randomization list, with 40 patients in each group. On enrolment, demographic and clinical data were gathered, including age, sex, admission diagnosis, number of days intubated before enrolment, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. The APACHE II score is a severity-of-disease classification system that is applied within 24 h of admission of a patient to the ICU. When data were missing, we used the complete-case analysis method. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the principal investigator’s institution and informed consent was obtained from the participants or family members.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

The inclusion criteria were: (1) The study’s participants were all critically ill patients who qualified for ICU admission; (2) The duration of the hospital stays, and the mechanical ventilation in the ICU were ≥24 h; (3) Patients who were sufficiently conscious to cooperate; (4) Patients or families who knew the research objectives and voluntarily signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) Patients with severe hemodynamic instability or arrhythmia; (2) Patients with pregnancy; (3) Those with mental illness; (4) Having respiratory tract infection before intubation.

DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE-BASED CLUSTER NURSING INTERVENTION PLAN:

To identify the clinical issues, a cluster nursing intervention team was formed. The team was composed of 1 head nurse, 5 experienced nurses having more than 7 years of ICU experience, and 3 systematic evidence-based training personnel. The evidence-based issues were raised in accordance with international evidence-based medical standards [15,16], and then the cluster nursing intervention was constructed answer the following: (1) whether implementation of isolation measures such as a quiet environment in the ICU can improve patients’ psychological condition associated with intubation and extubation; (2) whether proper body positioning can reduce the incidence of intubation and extubation-associated complications; (3) whether timely evaluation of patient consciousness and swallowing function can reduce the incidence of intubation and extubation-associated complications; (4) whether timely avoidance of aspiration refluxes can improve patients’ physiological condition associated with intubation and extubation in the ICU.

IMPLEMENTATION OF CLUSTER NURSING INTERVENTION:

The control group was given routine nursing intervention measures, including strictly monitoring blood pressure, blood gas levels, heart rate, and other physiologically vital indicators.

The study group was given 5 sessions of cluster nursing mode measures in addition to the routine nursing intervention. The specific measures were: (1) An intervention team composed of a chief physician and a head nurse as the core was established to train the ICU nursing staff and ensure that each nursing staff member understood the cluster nursing intervention program’s specific implementation requirements. After completing the training program, the qualified nurses could join the cluster nursing intervention team. (2) According to the cluster nursing intervention plan, team members adopted tailored nursing measures based on each patient’s circumstance and influencing factors, convened a monthly group meeting to summarize and discuss each measure’s implementation during the nursing process.

SAMPLE SIZE:

This sample size was assessed based on the t test (α=0.05) for cluster-randomized controlled studies by Murray [17] with an expected effect of a critical difference of 6 points (SD 12.5), an intracluster correlation of 0.05, and a power of 80%.

BLINDING:

Nurses who provided the interventions and assessed the results were aware of group allocation due to their involvement in the cluster nursing intervention training program. Although patients were not told of their group assignment, they may have been made aware of it because of unmasking information from nurses.

PRIMARY OUTCOME:

(1) Clinical complications, including bleeding of soft-tissue injury, glottic edema, cough, and upper respiratory tract obstruction, were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The overall incidence rate was measured as:

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (2) The patient’s anxiety and depression scores of the 2 groups were evaluated by the hospital anxiety and depression assessment scale. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), developed by Zigmond and Snaith [18], is a self-report questionnaire specifically designed to screen anxiety and depression of patients in non-psychiatric settings. It is a 14-item scale with 7 questions in each of 2 subscales for assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms. Each item is classified on a scale of 0 to 3, and the scores in each subset range from 0 to 21. The cut off scores were 10/11 for anxiety and 7/8 for depression subscales, as described previously [19]. According to these findings, scores of ≥11 and ≥8 suggest a significant risk of anxiety and depression, respectively.

(3) Patient satisfaction with nursing care services was evaluated using the Newcastle Satisfaction With Nursing Scale (NSNS) [20], Chinese version [21]. The NSNS comprises 2 subscales: the Satisfaction with Nursing Care Scale (SNCS) and the Experience of Nursing Care Scale. These 2 subscales can be utilized either separately or together. In this study, the SNCS was used with slight modifications, consisting of only 3 items, including nursing care quality, nursing professionalism, and nursing attitude, and using a 3-point Likert scale. For assessing the degree of satisfaction, ‘barely satisfied,’ ‘satisfied,’ and ‘very satisfied’ were scored from 0 to 10 points, with 8–10 points representing very satisfied, 5–7 points showing satisfied, and 0–4 points indicating barely satisfied. The overall satisfaction ratio was calculated as:

(4) The blood gas analysis, including PaO2, PaCO2, and blood pH 24 h after extubation was performed using an ABG analyzer (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Shanghai, China).

The reliability and validity of all the tools used in the present study were analyzed and compared with the established standards and benchmarks.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

SPSS version 20.0 software was used to analyze the data. The measurement data of the 2 groups of patients was tested using t test and expressed as x±s. The count data of the 2 groups of patients were assessed by χ2 test and expressed by [n (%)]. Statistical significance was assumed at P<0.05.

Results

BASELINE CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS:

The control group consisted of 21 females and 19 males, with a mean age of 44.31±5.24, ranging from 24 to 64 years. There were 20 males and 20 females in the intervention group, with an average age of 45.23±6.46 years (range, 26–68 years). Table 1 demonstrate that the 2 groups did not differ significantly regarding gender, age, number of days intubated before enrolment, admission reason, diagnosis on admission, and APACHE score (P>0.05).

ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION OUTCOMES:

The psychological state (anxiety and depression) of the patients in the control group and the intervention group after the specified nursing intervention was much better than before the nursing intervention, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). Interestingly, the anxiety and depression score of the patients after giving the cluster nursing intervention in the intervention group was much lower than that in the control group, and the difference was noticeable (P<0.05), as shown in Table 2.

BLOOD GAS AND PH INDEXES:

Before the nursing intervention, no apparent difference was observed in the PaCO2 and PaO2 levels and blood pH between the control and intervention groups (P>0.05). However, after the nursing intervention, the PaCO2 level of the intervention group was lower, and the PaO2 blood level was higher compared to the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05). After the nursing intervention, the blood pH of the 2 groups was comparable (P>0.05), as shown in Table 3.

PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH NURSING SERVICES:

Patients in the intervention group reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction with nursing services following the nursing intervention compared to those in the control group (P<0.05), as shown in Table 4.

INCIDENCE OF COMPLICATIONS:

There was a statistically significant reduction in the overall incidence of complications in the intervention group following the nursing intervention compared to the control group (2.50% vs 15.0%) (P<0.05; Table 5).

Discussion

STUDY LIMITATIONS:

Our study has a few limitations that needs to be addressed. First, the study was carried out in the ICU of a single representative public hospital. Individuals who use private hospitals may differ greatly from those utilizing public hospitals, hence necessitating additional research before drawing broad conclusions. Second, nurses who participated in the present work were aware of the group allocation and interventions; therefore, potential data collection bias cannot be excluded, and the findings should be interpreted with caution. Third, due to the small sample size and absence of evidence-based conversion studies in the present research, additional evidence-based data are needed to give a more reliable foundation for improving patient clinical prognosis by merging evidence-based information with clinical reality.

Conclusions

In this study, the efficacy of a cluster nursing intervention for tracheal intubation and extubation in ICU patients was evaluated. We found that the cluster nursing intervention can effectively lower the incidence of complications associated with artificial airway intubation and extubation. This intervention can also enhance patient satisfaction regarding nursing care services and significantly reduce depression and anxiety in ICU patients.

References

1. Kielb C, Hurlock-Chorostecki C, Sipprell D, Can minimal patient restraint be safely implemented in the Intensive Care Unit?: Dynamics, 2005; 16(1); 16-19

2. Kandeel NA, Attia AK, Physical restraints practice in adult intensive care units in Egypt: Nurs Health Sci, 2013; 15(1); 79-85

3. Jiang H, Li C, Gu Y, He Y, Nurses’ perceptions and practice of physical restraint in China: Nurs Ethics, 2015; 22(6); 652-60

4. Thille AW, Richard JC, Brochard L, The decision to extubate in the Intensive Care Unit: Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013; 187(12); 1294-302

5. Kulkarni AP, Agarwal V, Extubation failure in Intensive Care Unit: Predictors and management: Indian J Crit Care Med, 2008; 12(1); 1-9

6. Whitmore D, Mahambray T, Reintubation following planned extubation: Incidence, mortality and risk factors: Intensive Care Med Exp, 2015; 3(1); A684

7. Elmer J, Lee S, Rittenberger JC, Reintubation in critically ill patients: Procedural complications and implications for care: Critical Care, 2015; 19(1); 12

8. Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben-Ghezala H, Easily identified at-risk patients for extubation failure may benefit from noninvasive ventilation: A prospective before-after study: Critical care (London, England), 2016; 20; 48

9. Urden LD, Stacy KM, Thelan LA, Lough ME: Thelan’s critical care nursing: Diagnosis and management, 2006, MosbyInc

10. Shelton RC, Cooper BR, Stirman SW, The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and health care: Annu Rev Public Health, 2018; 39; 55-76

11. Hecht L, Buhse S, Meyer G, Effectiveness of training in evidence-based medicine skills for healthcare professionals: A systematic review: BMC Med Educ, 2016; 16(1); 103

12. Yang Y, Niu L, Wang S, Effect of cluster nursing intervention on recovery of neurological function and prevention of complications in ICU stroke patients: Panminerva Med, 2020 [Online ahead of print]

13. Wassenaar A, Schoonhoven L, Devlin JW, External validation of two models to predict delirium in critically ill adults using either the confusion assessment method-ICU or the intensive care delirium screening checklist for delirium assessment: Crit Care Med, 2019; 47(10); e827-e35

14. Huang S, Xu J, Du Y, The effect of evidence-based cluster nursing intervention on the incidences of delirium and the prognoses of ICU patients: Am J Transl Res, 2021; 13(7); 8309-15

15. Newhouse R, Dearholt S, Poe S, Evidence-based practice: A practical approach to implementation: J Nurs Adm, 2005; 35(1); 35-40

16. Otten RA, Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based practice model and guidelines: Nursing Education Perspectives, 2008; 29(4); 234

17. Murray DM, Taljaard M, Turner EL, George SM, Essential ingredients and innovations in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials: Annu Rev Public Health, 2020; 41(1); 1-19

18. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP, The hospital anxiety and depression scale: Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983; 67(6); 361-70

19. Köse I, Zincircioğlu Ç, Öztürk YK, Factors affecting anxiety and depression symptoms in relatives of Intensive Care Unit patients, 2016; 31(9); 611-17

20. Thomas LH, McColl E, Priest J, Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: An instrument for quality assessments of nursing care: Qual Health Care, 1996; 5(2); 67-72

21. Liu Y, Wang G, Inpatient satisfaction with nursing care and factors influencing satisfaction in a teaching hospital in China, 2007; 22(3); 266-71

22. Divatia JV, Khan PU, Myatra SN, Tracheal intubation in the ICU: Life saving or life threatening?: Indian J Anaesth, 2011; 55(5); 470-75

23. Arumugam SK, Mudali I, Strandvik G, Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients: A descriptive analysis: World J Emerg Med, 2018; 9(3); 203-10

24. Ferrer M, Bernadich O, Nava S, Torres A, Noninvasive ventilation after intubation and mechanical ventilation: Eur Respir J, 2002; 19(5); 959-65

25. Poeira A, Flamino R, Santos N, Rocha M, Nursing interventions in the extubation process: A scoping review: International Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal, 2020; 5; 258-63

26. Munro N, Ruggiero M, Ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle: Reconstruction for best care: Adv Crit Care, 2014; 25(2); 163-75

27. Van de Meeberg EK, Festen S, Improved detection of delirium, implementation and validation of the CAM-ICU in elderly Emergency Department patients: Eur J Emerg Med, 2017; 24(6); 411-16

28. Slang R, Finsrud LT, Olsen BF, Nursing interventions in Intensive Care Unit patients with breathing difficulties: A scoping review of the evidence: Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 2020; 40(4); 176-87

29. Al-Mailam FF, The effect of nursing care on overall patient satisfaction and its predictive value on return-to-provider behavior: A survey study: Qual Manag Health Care, 2005; 14(2); 116-20

30. Mohammed HA, Ali RI, Mussa Y, Assessment of adult patients satisfaction regarding nursing Care in Different Hospitals in Kirkuk City: Kirkuk University Journal-Scientific Studies, 2016; 11(3); 222-36

31. Woodward CA, Ostbye T, Craighead J, Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care in independent health facilities: Developing and assessing a tool to enhance public accountability: Am J Med Qual, 2000; 15(3); 94-105

32. Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review: Perspect Public Health, 2017; 137(2); 89-101

33. Zhou Q, Li SS, Wang QInfluence of cluster nursing intervention on inadequate drainage in vacuum sealing drainage for inpatients in burn unit: Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi, 2019; 35(2); 148-52 [in Chinese]

34. Zheng P, Wang J, Ma Y, Analysis of the effect of cluster nursing in postoperative hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage: J Healthc Eng, 2021; 2021; 3448979 [Retracted article]

35. Liu H, Yang Y, Effects of a psychological nursing intervention on prevention of anxiety and depression in the postpartum period: A randomized controlled trial: Ann Gen Psychiatry, 2021; 20(1); 2

36. Yang L, Ling D, Ye L, Zeng M, Psychological nursing intervention on anxiety and depression in patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled study protocol: Medicine, 2020; 99(48); e23127

37. Liu M, Shi B, Nursing intervention reduces depression for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial protocol: Medicine, 2020; 99(47); e23268

In Press

Clinical Research  

Ultrasound-Guided PRP and SVF Therapy Shows Sustained Improvement in Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A 12-Month...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943975  

Clinical Research  

Olfactory Dysfunction as a Marker for Cognitive Impairment in General Paresis of the Insane: A Clinical Study

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944243  

Clinical Research  

Endoscopic and Microscopic Tympanoplasty for Adhesive Otitis Media: A Comparative Prospective Analysis

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945152  

Clinical Research  

Status of Professional Identity, Self-Directed Learning Competence, and Self-Efficacy Among Central Sterile...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944044  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   4,462,997

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   1,599,717

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   691,092

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial   50,889

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750