05 December 2013 : Original article
Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: A comparison of hypertensive and normotensive patients
Nermin Sardogan AcarABCDEF, Sinan UzmanABCDEF, Mehmet ToptasBCDE, Ibrahim AkkocDEF, Ayse VahapogluCDEF, Safiye Cakir DincABEDOI: 10.12659/MSM.889412
Med Sci Monit 2013; 19:1109-1113
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypotension is the most common problem with spinal anesthesia. This prospective study aimed to compare normotensive and hypertensive patients with respect to the hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo various elective operations under spinal anesthesia were included into the study. The patients were separated into 2 groups: hypertensive patients constituted Group H (n=30) and normotensive patients constituted Group N (n=30). After fluid loading, spinal anesthesia was performed with 3.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Demographic characteristics and incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were compared. Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean blood pressures (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were also compared before and after spinal anesthesia.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to demographic characteristics, maximal height of sensory block, incidences of hypotension and bradycardia, and the amount of fluids infused (p>0.05). In the hypertensive patient group, the SBP, DBP, and MBP values were significantly higher than in the normotensive patient group at all measurement times (p<0.05). Comparison within the groups did not reveal any significant differences in either group compared to the basal values (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in HR between or within groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between normotensive and hypertensive patients in the incidences of hypotension caused by spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.
Keywords: Blood Pressure - drug effects, Anesthesia, Spinal - methods, Bupivacaine - pharmacology, Heart Rate - drug effects, Hypertension - physiopathology, Prospective Studies, Surgical Procedures, Elective - methods
Editorial
01 January 2025 : Editorial
Editorial: The Human Cell Atlas. What Is It and Where Could It Take Us?DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947707
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947707
In Press
Animal Research
Role of the Dorsal Cortex of the Inferior Colliculus in the Precedence EffectMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945605
Laboratory Research
Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Silicone-Based Putty Reline Impressions with Differen...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946537
Clinical Research
Ankle-Brachial Index as a Predictor of Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Event After Central Retinal Artery Oc...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945937
Review article
COL3A1 Gene Polymorphism and Its Impact on Female Pelvic Organ ProlapseMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946367
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,962,174
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 699,683
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Mar 2024 : Editorial 22,873
Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204
28 Jan 2024 : Review article 17,628
A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and FutureDOI :10.12659/MSM.943912
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912