30 December 2013 : Original article
The applicability of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test in a Turkish population
Hakan TekeliABEFG, Aytuğ AltundağABDEG, Murat SalihoğluBCEFG, Melih ÇayönüABCDEG, Mustafa Tansel KendirliBCDEFGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.889838
Med Sci Monit 2013; 19:1221-1226
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory assessment is often neglected in clinical practice, although olfactory loss can assist in diagnosis and may lead to significant morbidity. “Sniffin’ Sticks” is a modern test of nasal chemosensory performance that was developed in Germany and validated in many countries. Our aim was to validate the applicability of “Sniffin’ Sticks” in a Turkish population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 123 healthy volunteers with a reported normal sense of smell and 51 patients complaining of a reduction in their olfactory function presenting either at rhinology or neurology clinics. The mean age of the subjects tested was 30.2±12.5 years in 126 males and 48 females. The participants were divided into 2 groups according to subjective olfactory function – healthy or abnormal. Each subject’s olfactory function was assessed using the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test.
RESULTS: We found significant differences in “Sniffin’ Sticks” test results between the abnormal and healthy groups. In healthy subjects, the 10th percentiles of odor threshold score, odor discrimination score, odor identification score, and TDI score were 7.25, 12, 11, and 32, respectively. Considering the 2 groups together, apple and turpentine were the least well-recognized odors from the 16 odors presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides an update of normative values for routine clinical use of “Sniffin’ Sticks” in a Turkish population. Also, the present study validates that “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test was applicable for clinical usage in a Turkish population.
Keywords: Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology, Case-Control Studies, Odors, Olfaction Disorders - diagnosis, Reference Values, Sensory Thresholds, Smell - physiology, Turkey
Editorial
01 January 2025 : Editorial
Editorial: The Human Cell Atlas. What Is It and Where Could It Take Us?DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947707
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947707
In Press
Clinical Research
Impact of Smovey Vibration Versus Dumbbell Resistance on Muscle Activation in WomenMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946567
Clinical Research
Five-Year Impact of Weight Loss on Knee Pain and Quality of Life in Obese PatientsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946550
Clinical Research
Butorphanol Tartrate Nasal Spray for Post-Cesarean Analgesia and Prolactin SecretionMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945224
Database Analysis
Role of the Carhart Effect and Outcomes from Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 532 Patients with Conductive...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947061
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,963,045
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 700,086
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Mar 2024 : Editorial 23,449
Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204
28 Jan 2024 : Review article 18,141
A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and FutureDOI :10.12659/MSM.943912
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912