01 July 2015
: Meta-Analysis
Gonorrhea and Prostate Cancer Incidence: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 21 Epidemiologic Studies
Wen-Qing Lian ABCDEF , Fei Luo ABCDEF , Xian-Lu Song BD , Yong-Jie Lu DG , Shan-Chao Zhao ACDEGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.893579
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:1895-1903
Supplementary Table 1. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
| A. Methodologic quality of case-control studies included in the meta-analysis. | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection | Comparability | Exposure | Total quality scores | |||||||
| Adequate definition of cases | Representativeness of cases | Selection of control subjects | Definition of control subjects | Study controls for age / gender | Study controls for additional factors | Exposure assessment | Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non-Response rate | ||
| Baker et al., 1981 | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | 7 |
| Checkoway et al., 1987 | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | 6 |
| Hayes et al., 2000 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | 7 |
| Heshmat et al., 1975 | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | 6 |
| Hiatt et al., 1994 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | 8 |
| Honda et al., 1988 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | 8 |
| Hrbacek et al., 2011 | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | 6 |
| Hsieh et al., 1999 | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | 5 |
| Huang et al., 2008 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | 8 |
| Ilic et al., 1996 | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | 6 |
| La Vecchia et al., 1993 | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | 7 |
| Lees et al., 1985 | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | 6 |
| Mishina et al., 1985 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | 8 |
| Oishi et al., 1989 | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | 6 |
| Patel et al., 2005 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | 7 |
| Pelucchi et al., 2006 | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | 7 |
| Rosenblatt et al., 2001 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | 7 |
| Sanderson et al., 2004 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | 7 |
| Sarma et al., 2006 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | 7 |
| B. Methodologic quality of cohort studies included in the meta-analysis. | ||||||||||
| Sutcliffe et al., 2006 | Cheng et al., 2010 | |||||||||
| Selection | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | + | + | |||||||
| Selection of the unexposed cohort | + | + | ||||||||
| Ascertainment of exposure | + | − | ||||||||
| Outcome of interest was not present at start of study shown | + | + | ||||||||
| Comparability | Study controls for age/gender | + | + | |||||||
| Study controls for additional factors | + | + | ||||||||
| Outcome | Assessment of outcome | + | + | |||||||
| Follow-up long enough for outcomes | + | + | ||||||||
| Adequacy of follow up | + | + | ||||||||
| Quality score | 9 | 8 | ||||||||






