12 September 2020 : Clinical Research
Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability
Jinpeng Du1CDE, Lin Gao1BE, Dageng Huang1CD, Lequn Shan1BC, Wentao Wang1BF, Yong Fan1BF, Dingjun Hao1G, Liang Yan1AG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924770
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924770
Table 3 Subgroup analysis for partial primary outcomes.
| Accuracy (Grade A+B) | Facet joint violation (Grade 0) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA (n=757) (%) | ON (n=878) (%) | P value | RA (n=751) (%) | ON (n=884) (%) | P value | |
| Thoracic vertebrae | 82 (100.0) | 94 (98.0) | 0.189 | 81 (98.8) | 90 (93.8) | 0.085 |
| Lumbar vertebrae | 675 (99.6) | 784 (96.6)) | 670 (98.8) | 794 (97.8) | 0.128 | |
| Yes | 19 (90.5) | 12 (50.0) | 21 (100.0) | 18 (75.0) | ||
| No | 738 (99.9) | 866 (98.0) | 730 (98.8) | 868 (98.2) | 0.207 | |
| Yes (BMI ≥28) | 154 (100.0) | 161 (94.7) | 149 (96.8) | 159 (93.5) | 0.181 | |
| No (BMI <28) | 603 (99.5) | 717 (97.2) | 602 (99.3) | 725 (98.2) | 0.072 | |
| According to Chinese Body Mass Index (BMI) standard. RA – Robot-assisted; ON – O-arm navigation system. | ||||||