12 September 2020 : Clinical Research
Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability
Jinpeng Du1CDE, Lin Gao1BE, Dageng Huang1CD, Lequn Shan1BC, Wentao Wang1BF, Yong Fan1BF, Dingjun Hao1G, Liang Yan1AG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924770
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924770
Table 4 Comparison of clinical outcomes between the 2 technologies.
| Parameter | RA (n=136) (%) | ON (n=166) (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time for surgery (min) | 150±41 | 179±50 | |
| Postoperative revision for screw malposition | 0 (0) | 2 (1.2) | 0.199 |
| Blood loss (ml) | 184±120 | 230±172 | |
| Postoperative stay (d) | 4.3±2.9 | 5.0±3.1 | |
| Dural tears | 2 | 1 | |
| Surgical wound revision | 1 | 2 | |
| Wound Infections | 0 | 1 | |
| Seroma | 1 | 3 | |
| Neurological complications | 0 | 2 | |
| 4 (2.9%) | 9 (5.4%) | 0.309 | |
| RA – Robot-assisted; ON – O-arm navigation system. | |||