26 September 2020 : Database Analysis
Prognostic Value of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Score in Critically Ill Patients with Cirrhosis and ACLF
Xinran Lin1ABCDEF, Xielin Huang2ABCDEF, Li Wang1BC, Shuyi Feng1B, Xiaofu Chen1BC, Weimin Cai1B, Zhiming Huang1A*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.926574
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e926574
Supplementary Table 1 Diagnostic accuracy of scoring systems at cutoff points and at different time periods in ACLF patients.
| Prognostic models | 28-day AUROC | P value* | 90-day AUROC | P value* | 180-day AUROC | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AARC ACLF | 0.704 | – | 0.679 | – | 0.690 | – |
| Child-Pugh score | 0.549 | 0.526 | 0.524 | |||
| MELD | 0.666 | 0.297 | 0.660 | 0.589 | 0.690 | 0.535 |
| MELD-Na | 0.656 | 0.247 | 0.645 | 0.417 | 0.643 | 0.264 |
| SOFA | 0.688 | 0.703 | 0.679 | 0.998 | 0.668 | 0.984 |
| CLIF-SOFA | 0.651 | 0.089 | 0.640 | 0.180 | 0.649 | 0.167 |
| CLIF-C ACLFs | 0.719 | 0.670 | 0.694 | 0.665 | 0.699 | 0.792 |
| AUROC – area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; MELD – model for end-stage liver disease; SOFA – Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; CLIF-SOFA – Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score. * DeLong test was used to compare the performance of each scoring systems with AARC ACLF. | ||||||






