09 October 2020 : Clinical Research
Comparison Between Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Yang Zhang1ABCDEF, Hengjie Zhu1ABCDEF, Zheng Zhou1BCDEF, Jixiang Wu1BCDEF, Yinming Sun1BCD, Xiang Shen1BCDE, Chengcun Li1BCDEF*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.926631
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e926631
Table 2 General clinical results in the fenestration and PTED groups.
| Clinical | Fenestration (n=94) | PTED (n=94) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incision length (cm) | 3.57±0.75 | 0.82±0.32 | <0.001 |
| Blood loss (mL) | 115.32±11.46 | 49.63±5.86 | <0.001 |
| Operative time (min) | 66.32±15.32 | 68.75±11.56 | 0.085 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 2.55±0.71 | 4.62±0.83 | <0.001 |
| Complication rate | 3 (3.2%) | 3 (3.2%) | >1.000 |
| PTED – percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression. All data were compared using a test. | |||