Dynamic Structural and Functional Reorganizations Following Motor Stroke

11 March 2021 : Clinical Research

Yumei Xia^1AE, Gelun Huang^1CE, Xuemei Quan^1B, Qixiong Qin^1D, Hui Li^1F, Ci Xu^1BF, Zhijian Liang^1AG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.929092

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e929092

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 2 Clinical and imaging indicators of subjects at different time points.

	Controls (n=34)	Patients W1 (n=34)	Patients W4 (n=34)	Patients W12 (n=34)
FMA (0–100)	–	51.315±9.209	73.355±8.854^**	89.703±7.870,^**
Barthel index (0–100)	–	54.732±12.937	77.708±8.634^**	86.368±14.409,^**
Interhemispheric FC	1.01±0.043	0.587±0.119^*	0.929±0.077,^*	0.969±0.093,,^*
FA in ipsilesional CST	0.547±0.058	0.448±0.029^*	0.492±0.033,^*	0.544±0.045,^**
FA in contralesional CST	0.547±0.058	0.538±0.055	0.544±0.048	0.548±0.040
FA – fractional anisotropy; FMA – Fugl-Meyer Assessment; FC – functional connectivity. The FA of healthy controls were derived from averages of bilateral CST measurements. ^* Compared with the control group, ^ compared with week 1, ^* compared with week 4,

Back to the Article