26 May 2021 : Clinical Research
A Study of Blended Learning Using the Smart Class Teaching Module on Psychosocial Dysfunction Course During the Training of Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students in China
Qiang Lin1234CDEF, Yaxian Qiu123CDEF, Yanni Zhang123BCD, Yuxing Zheng123BCD, Lingzi Zhang5CD, Junjie Liang123BC, Yilifate Anniwaer13E, Yujun Liao
12C, Yueyi Jiang2B, Shijuan Lang123B, Wanqi Zhuang2B, Siyi Luo2B, Meifeng Zheng123B, QingHua Yan6CDEF*, Ke Chen 7CDE, Qiuxia Chen8CDEF, Haining Ou 1234ADEG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.931748
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e931748
Table 2 The differences in course scores between the 2 types of teaching modules.
| The Smart Class teaching module | The Traditional Class teaching module | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assignment score | 86.25±2.67 | 83.17±4.43 | |
| Practical exam score | 86.00±1.75 | 82.83±5.75 | |
| Written exam score | 74.00±7.15 | 75.88±10.39 | 0.534 |
| Final score | 77.63±5.16 | 78.00±8.25 | 0.874 |
| The higher assignment score and practical exam score in the Smart Class teaching module group than those in the Traditional Class teaching module group. Values are presented as a number or mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance was set as | |||