Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Huachao Sui; Bo Zhao; Haidan Nie; Xin Hao; Feng Qiao; Cuicui Sun; Changyi Li; Liwen Zhou; Ligeng Wu

doi:10.12659/MSM.932410

13 October 2021 : Clinical Research

Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Huachao Sui^1ABE, Bo Zhao^2ABE, Haidan Nie^3BE, Xin Hao^1BG, Feng Qiao^4C, Cuicui Sun^3C, Changyi Li^5G, Liwen Zhou^3E, Ligeng Wu^3AG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932410

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932410

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 2 Shapiro-Wilk normality test of 8 coordinate points for males and females.

Variable	Men N=198		Women N=302
Variable	W	P-value	W	P-value
Age	0.97	0.00	0.89	0.00^*
x	0.99	0.14	0.99	0.11
y	0.99	0.16	0.99	0.02^*
x	0.99	0.24	0.99	0.02^*
y	0.99	0.14	0.99	0.02^*
x	0.98	0.01^*	0.87	0.00^*
y	0.99	0.14	0.98	0.00^*
x	0.99	0.62	0.99	0.13
y	0.99	0.58	0.99	0.03^*
x	0.99	0.14	0.90	0.00^*
y	0.99	0.04^*	0.96	0.00^*
x	0.98	0.02^*	0.99	0.25
y	0.98	0.01^*	0.99	0.19
x	0.98	0.00^*	0.99	0.13
y	0.99	0.19	0.99	0.01^*
x	0.99	0.09	0.98	0.00^*
y	0.99	0.07	1.00	0.49
PHPA	0.99	0.21	1.00	0.76
RCOPA	0.98	0.01^*	0.99	0.01^*
Ratio	0.89	0.00^*	0.89	0.00^*
^* PHPA – pulp horn projection-connecting lines area; RCOPA – root canal orifice projection-connecting lines area.

Back to the Article

Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Your Privacy