Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Huachao Sui; Bo Zhao; Haidan Nie; Xin Hao; Feng Qiao; Cuicui Sun; Changyi Li; Liwen Zhou; Ligeng Wu

doi:10.12659/MSM.932410

13 October 2021 : Clinical Research

Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Huachao Sui^1ABE, Bo Zhao^2ABE, Haidan Nie^3BE, Xin Hao^1BG, Feng Qiao^4C, Cuicui Sun^3C, Changyi Li^5G, Liwen Zhou^3E, Ligeng Wu^3AG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932410

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932410

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance of 8 coordinate points for males and females.

Variable	F	P-value
Age	12.95	0.00^*
x	0.10	0.75
y	0.13	0.71
x	0.11	0.74
y	0.00	0.95
x	5.43	0.02^*
y	0.50	0.48
x	2.50	0.11
y	0.05	0.82
x	0.05	0.82
y	0.03	0.87
x	10.11	0.00^*
y	3.29	0.07
x	7.97	0.00^*
y	0.43	0.51
x	0.11	0.74
y	1.00	0.32
PHPA	4.85	0.03^*
RCOPA	4.75	0.03^*
Ratio	0.41	0.52
^* PHPA – pulp horn projection-connecting lines area; RCOPA – root canal orifice projection-connecting lines area.

Back to the Article

Comparing the Traditional Versus Conservative Endodontic Access Cavities Design of the Maxillary First Molar: Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Your Privacy