22 March 2022 : Clinical Research
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to Guide Personalized Embryo Transfer with Conventional Frozen Embryo Transfer in 281 Chinese Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure
Yan Jia1BCDEF, Yulin Sha12BF, Zhu Qiu1BCD, Yanhua Guo1CE, Aixiang Tan1EF, Yan Huang1EF, Ying Zhong1EF, Yajun Dong1ADF, Hongxia Ye1ADG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935634
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935634
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline patient characteristics between the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) and conventional frozen embryo transfer (FET) groups.
| Characteristic | ERA group (n=140) | FET group (n=141) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32.01±2.99 | 31.87±3.21 | >0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m) | 21.21±0.8 | 21.17±0.79 | >0.05 |
| AMH in the fresh cycle (ng/mL) | 4.26±0.71 | 5.12±1.98 | >0.05 |
| FSH in the fresh cycle (IU) | 7.40±1.69 | 7.00±1.67 | >0.05 |
| AFC in the fresh cycle | 16.35±8.19 | 18.25±9.29 | >0.05 |
| Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer (cm) | 0.97±0.11 | 0.95±0.23 | >0.05 |
| Number of attempts with ART | 5.79±0.97 | 6.10±0.83 | >0.05 |
| BMI – body mass index; AMH – anti-Mullerian hormone; FSH – follicle-stimulating hormone; AFC – antral follicle count; ART – assisted reproductive technology. | |||