23 August 2022 : Meta-Analysis
Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis
Yudi Wu1CDEF, Yajia Li2BCD, Jia Guo2BC, Qianxiang Li34BC, Jianhuang Wu35BCD, Ziqin Cao5ABCDEF*, Yulin Song6ABCDEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.937118
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937118
Table 4 The league plots of subjective improvement. Main network analysis (red) and subgroup analysis (blue). (From the top left to the bottom right, higher comparator vs lower comparator, WMD with 95% CI).
| nwRepair | −2.53 (−9.40, 4.34) | −3.58 (−9.92, 2.76) | −4.10 (−10.17, 1.97) | −4.72 (−11.06, 1.62) | −7.93 (−14.26, −1.59) |
| 0.76 (−4.76, 6.28) | waRepair | −1.05 (−4.70, 2.60) | −1.57 (−4.78, 1.64) | −2.19 (−5.89, 1.51) | −5.40 (−9.08, −1.72) |
| 0.69 (−4.30, 5.68) | −0.08 (−3.55, 3.40) | nirAllograft | −0.52 (−2.34, 1.31) | −1.14 (−3.70, 1.42) | −4.35 (−6.82, −1.87) |
| 1.01 (−3.63, 5.66) | 0.25 (−2.75, 3.26) | 0.33 (−1.52, 2.18) | Autograft | −0.62 (−2.47, 1.23) | −3.83 (−5.64, −2.01) |
| 1.33 (−3.55, 6.20) | 0.56 (−2.75, 3.88) | 0.64 (−1.68, 2.96) | 0.31 (−1.20, 1.82) | Hybrid | −3.21 (−5.38, −1.04) |
| 4.77 (−0.23, 9.78) | 4.01 (0.49, 7.53) | 4.09 (1.56, 6.62) | 3.76 (1.88, 5.64) | 3.45 (1.34, 5.56) | irAllograft |