23 August 2022 : Meta-Analysis
Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis
Yudi Wu1CDEF, Yajia Li2BCD, Jia Guo2BC, Qianxiang Li34BC, Jianhuang Wu35BCD, Ziqin Cao5ABCDEF*, Yulin Song6ABCDEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.937118
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937118
Table 5 The league plots of functional improvement. Main network analysis (red) and subgroup analysis (blue). (From the top left to the bottom right, higher comparator vs lower comparator, SMD with 95% CI).
| nwaRepair | −0.95 (−2.05, 0.16) | −0.95 (−2.05, 0.15) | −1.12 (−2.33, 0.09) | −1.25 (−2.54, 0.05) | −1.35 (−2.58, −0.11) |
| 0.76 (−0.09, 1.60) | Autograft | −0.01 (−0.74, 0.72) | −0.18 (−0.67, 0.32) | −0.30 (−0.98, 0.38) | −0.40 (−0.95, 0.15) |
| 0.80 (−0.09, 1.69) | 0.05 (−0.54, 0.63) | waRepair | −0.17 (−1.05, 0.71) | −0.29 (−1.29, 0.71) | −0.40 (−1.31, 0.52) |
| 0.90 (−0.04, 1.84) | 0.14 (−0.28, 0.56) | 0.10 (−0.62, 0.82) | nirAllograft | −0.13 (−0.96, 0.71) | −0.23 (−0.94, 0.49) |
| 1.01 (0.06, 1.96) | 0.25 (−0.19, 0.70) | 0.21 (−0.53, 0.94) | 0.11 (−0.50, 0.72) | Hybrid | −0.10 (−0.85, 0.65) |
| 1.14 (0.17, 2.12) | 0.39 (−0.09, 0.87) | 0.34 (−0.42, 1.10) | 0.25 (−0.37, 0.87) | 0.14 (−0.45, 0.72) | irAllograft |