23 August 2022>: Meta-Analysis
Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis
Yudi Wu 1CDEF , Yajia Li 2BCD , Jia Guo 2BC , Qiangxiang Li 34BC , Jianhuang Wu 35BCD , Ziqin Cao 5ABCDEF* , Yulin Song 6ABCDEF*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937118
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937118
Table 6 The league plots of activity recovery. Main network analysis (red) and subgroup analysis (blue). (From the top left to the bottom right, higher comparator vs lower comparator, WMD with 95% CI).
waRepair | −0.20 (−0.75, 0.34) | −0.22 (−0.54, 0.11) | −0.30 (−0.73, 0.12) | −0.38 (−0.76, −0.01) | −0.77 (−1.18, −0.36) |
0.23 (−0.31, 0.78) | nwaRepair | −0.02 (−0.58, 0.55) | −0.10 (−0.74, 0.53) | −0.18 (−0.78, 0.41) | −0.57 (−1.19, 0.05) |
0.30 (0.01, 0.60) | 0.07 (−0.49, 0.63) | Autograft | −0.09 (−0.36, 0.19) | −0.17 (−0.34, 0.01) | −0.55 (−0.80, −0.31) |
0.31 (−0.06, 0.69) | 0.08 (−0.53, 0.68) | 0.01 (−0.22, 0.23) | Hybrid | −0.08 (−0.40, 0.25) | −0.47 (−0.80, −0.13) |
0.45 (0.10, 0.79) | 0.21 (−0.37, 0.80) | 0.14 (−0.02, 0.31) | 0.13 (−0.15, 0.41) | nirAllograft | −0.39 (−0.68, −0.09) |
0.84 (0.46, 1.23) | 0.61 (0.00, 1.22) | 0.54 (0.30, 0.78) | 0.53 (0.23, 0.84) | 0.40 (0.11, 0.69) | irAllograft |