23 September 2022 : Clinical Research
Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew
Uri Gottlieb1ABCDEF*, Tomer Yona2BDE, David Shein Lumbroso1BDE, Jay R. Hoffman1E, Shmuel Springer1ABCDEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.937831
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937831
Table 2 Outcomes of the instruments. All values are median (IQR).
| Participants with ankle condition | Healthy participants | |
|---|---|---|
| AII | 6.0 (3.0) | 1.0 (2.0) |
| CAIT | 15.0 (8.0) | 27.0 (3.5) |
| IdFAI | 22.0 (8.5) | 5.0 (6.0) |
| FAAM | 90.6 (15.3) | 100.0 (1.3) |
| FAAM | 67.9 (33.9) | 100.0 (5.4) |
| SF-12 PCS | 54.8 (11.9) | 57.2 (2.3) |
| SF-12 MCS | 46.1 (15.1) | 50.0 (12.2) |
| AII – Ankle Instability Instrument; CAIT – Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool; IdFAI – Identification of Functional Ankle Instability; FAAM – Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; ADL – Activities of Daily Living; SF – short-form; PCS – Physical Component Score; MCS – Mental Component Score. | ||