Influence of Surface Type with Coffee Immersion on Surface Topography and Optical and Mechanical Properties of Selected Ceramic Materials

Abdulrahman H. Alzahrani; Lujain Ibrahim N. Aldosari; Abdulkhaliq Ali F. Alshadidi; Mohammed M. Al Moaleem; Ramzi A.A. Dhamiri; Mohammad B.F. Aldossary; Yahya Y. Hazazi; Fahad A.M. Awaji; Abdullah Mohsen Ageeli

doi:10.12659/MSM.938354

02 November 2022 : Database Analysis

Influence of Surface Type with Coffee Immersion on Surface Topography and Optical and Mechanical Properties of Selected Ceramic Materials

Abdulrahman H. Alzahrani^1ADF, Lujain Ibrahim N. Aldosari^2BEF, Abdulkhaliq Ali F. Alshadidi^3AEFG, Mohammed M. Al Moaleem^45ABDEF*, Ramzi A.A. Dhamiri^6BCG, Mohammad B.F. Aldossary^6ABG, Yahya Y. Hazazi^6ABG, Fahad A.M. Awaji^6ABG, Abdullah Mohsen Ageeli^6ABG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938354

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938354

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 7 ANOVA interaction of TP, OP, and Ra among different surface types with different ceramic materials.

Source	Type III sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	Sig.

Ceramic (Suprinity, Enamic, Mark II)	14.655	2	7.327	1.584	0.216
ST (glazed, polished)	.103	1	0.103	0.022	0.882
Ceramic*ST	42.688	2	21.344	4.614	0.015^*
Error	222.060	48	4.626

Ceramic (Suprinity, Enamic, Mark II)	18.060	2	9.030	1.350	0.269
ST (glazed, polished)	40.439	1	40.439	6.046	0.018^*
Ceramic*ST	67.538	2	33.769	5.049	0.010^*
Error	321.066	48	6.689

Ceramic (Suprinity, Enamic, Mark II)	.001	2	0.001	9.962	0.000^*
ST (glazed, polished)	.001	1	0.001	18.826	0.000^*
Ceramic*ST	.001	2	0.001	10.850	0.000^*
Error	.003	48	5.386E-5
^* Significant difference at P-value ≤0.05.

Back to the Article

Influence of Surface Type with Coffee Immersion on Surface Topography and Optical and Mechanical Properties of Selected Ceramic Materials

Your Privacy