29 December 2022>: Database Analysis
A Systematic Review of Publications Using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) to Monitor Education in Medical Colleges in Saudi Arabia
Manea M. Al-Ahmari 1ACE , Mohammed M. Al Moaleem 23ACEF* , Razan Ahmad Khudhayr 4BG , Athar Ali Sulaily 4BG , Balqees Ahmed M. Alhazmi 4BG , Mousa Ismail S. AlAlili 5BG , Abdulrahman Mushabbab Alqahtani 6BG , Haya Sultan N. Alassaf 7BG , Imtinan Ahmed Madkhali 4BG , Asma Mohammed Shagagi 8BG , Ibtisam Mohammed Masoud 9BG , Ali Mohammed Rizq 9BGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.938987
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938987
Table 3 Risk of bias ratings based on Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.
Research (S) | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | D8 | Total (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alshareef et al []37 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Essa []38 | + | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 (13%) |
Aga et al []39 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Atwa et al []40 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Abbas et al []41 | + | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 (13%) |
Khan et al []42 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Al-Natour []43 | + | − | + | X | − | + | + | X | 4 (50%) |
Soliman et al []44 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 8 (100%) |
Altemani & Merghani []45 | + | X | + | X | + | − | + | X | 4 (50%) |
Imran et al []46 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | X | 7 (87%) |
Nouh et al []47 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Al Sheikh []48 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Al-Faris et al []49 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 8 (100%) |
Hasan & Gupta []50 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Hasan et al []51 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | + | 7 (87%) |
Mojaddid et al []52 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | + | 7 (87%) |
Al-Mohaimeed []53 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Zawawi & Elzubeir []54 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | + | 6 (75%) |
Al-Kabbaa et al []55 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Alshehri et al []56 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Al-Ayed & Sheik []57 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | X | 7 (87%) |
Al Rukban et al []58 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Makhdoom []59 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Al-hazmi et al []60 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | X | 7 (87%) |
Al-hazimi et al []61 | + | + | + | X | + | + | + | X | 6 (75%) |
Martis et al []62 | + | + | + | X | + | + | X | X | 5 (62%) |
Rawas & Yasmeen []63 | + | X | − | X | X | X | + | X | 2 (25%) |
Irfan et al []64 | + | X | + | X | + | + | + | X | 5 (52%) |
Al Nozha & Fade []65 | + | + | − | X | + | − | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Sayed & El-Sayed []66 | X | X | + | X | + | X | X | X | 2 (25%) |
Arora et al []67 | + | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 1 (12%) |
Aldowsari et al []20 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | X | 7 (70%) |
Al Moaleem et al []21 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | X | 7 (70%) |
Sabbagh et al []68 | + | − | + | X | − | + | + | X | 4 (50%) |
Al-Saleh et al []69 | + | X | X | X | + | + | − | X | 3 (37%) |
Al-Samadani et al []70 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 0 (00%) |
Farooqi et al []71 | + | X | + | X | + | + | + | X | 5 (62%) |
Ahmed et al []72 | + | X | − | X | + | − | + | X | 3 (37%) |
Ansari et al []73 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 8 (100%) |
Mahrous et al []74 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | 0 (00%) |
: High (); Unclear (−; Low ().Where’s D1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?, D2: Were the study subjects and setting described in detail?, D3: Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?, D4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?, D5: Were confounding factors indented?, D6: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?, D7: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?, D8: Was the response rate adequate and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?. UQU – Umm Al-Qura University; JU – Jazan University; MC – Medical college; KSAU-HS – King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; BU – Bisha University; IA-RBFU – Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University; KSU – King Saud University; TU – Tabuk University; KA-ZU – King Abdulaziz University; IMSIU – Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University; A-FU – Al-Faisal University; DU – Dammam University; QU – Qassim university; TU-Al Maddinah – Taibah University; KFMC – King Fahad Medical City; KKU – King Khalid University; SU – Sana’a University; DU – Dundee University; AMSC – Applied Medical Sciences Colleges; RR – response rate; NM – not mentioned; Ms – Males; Fs – Females; ↑ – Higher; EL– educational level; ↔ – between; SD – Significant different; NSD – non-significant different; SPL – students’ perceptions of learning; SPT – students’ perceptions of teachers; SPA – students’ perceptions of atmosphere; SASP – students’ academic self-perception: SSSP – students’ social self-perception. |