Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry

23 January 2023 : Laboratory Research

Ayse Gunay^1ABCDEF*, Sema Celenk^1EF, Ozkan Adiguzel

^2AE, Suzan Cangul^3AEF, Nida Ozcan^4BE, Ezgi Eroglu Cakmakoglu^5A

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939065

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e939065

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Mean and standard deviations of viable cell values.

Groups	Cell viability
Groups	Mean±SD (1st day)	Mean±SD (3th day)	Mean±SD (7th day)	Friedman p*
Riva Silver	32538±1335^ce	28247±780^bc	43510±4232^b	<0.001
Equia Forte HT	31439±464^ab	18454±331^ab	39135±6514^a
ChemFil Rock	27347±2577^bde	–	–
Ketac™ Molar Easymix	11964±926^acd	262.5±43.7^ac	21±2.6^ab
Control Group	60377±1559	37710±631	90557±4512
^* Friedman test was performed, and ^a,b,c,d,e There is a statistically significant difference between the same letter symbols in the same column for each bacterium.

Back to the Article