27 December 2023: Review Articles
A Comparative Analysis of Marginal Adaptation Values between Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies
Ghadeer S. Alwadai 1DEG , Mohammed M. Al Moaleem 2ADE* , Arwa A. Daghrery 3CEF , Nassreen H. Albar 3DEF , Abdulelah A. Daghriri 4ABG , Manar M. AlGhamdi 5BG , Sana E. Ageel 6BG , Faisal A.A. Daghreeri 6BG , Taha M.A. Al-Amri 7ABDF , Waseem H. Aridhi 8BG , Raid A. Almnea 9AFG , Khalid D. Alhendi 10ADGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.942649
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e942649
Table 1 Summary of in vitro studies using lithium disilicate glass ceramic and zirconia all-ceramic materials.
| Researchers/Year | Abutment type/ arch/tooth type | EC material – fabrication system | Preparation details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| / mandibular/ | Ferrule, but joint, partial coverage | |||
| Ferrule, but joint, full coverage | ||||
| Ferrule, but joint, partial coverage | ||||
| Ferrule, but joint, full coverage | ||||
| / maxillary/ | Ferrule, but joint, chamfer or shoulder finish line | |||
| / mandibular/ | Butt-joint and 3 mm ferrule and 2 mm thickness | |||
| / mandibular/ | Butt-joint & 1.5 mm width. All walls were 3 mm height | |||
| Only buccal wall reduced until 3 mm height | ||||
| Only lingual and one proximal wall reduced until 3 mm height | ||||
| / mandibular/ | Ferrule and butt joint margins with 3 mm intra-pulpal depth | |||
| / mandibular/ | Ferrule and cavity wall thickness 2.0 and intra-pulpal 5.0 mm | |||
| / mandibular/ | 2 mm ferrule, butt joint, 2 mm axial wall thickness | |||
| / maxillary/ | No intra-radicular extension | |||
| 3 mm intra-radicular extension | ||||
| No intra-radicular extension | ||||
| 3 mm intra-radicular extension | ||||
| / mandibular/ | 1.5 mm ferrule and butt-joints margins | |||
| / mandibular/ | 2 mm ferrule, butt joint and 3 mm intra-pulpal extension | |||
| / mandibular/ | 2 mm ferrule, 2 mm axial wall and 4 mm intra-pulpal | |||
| / maxillary/ | Presence of ferrule, 3 mm axial wall and extension of 2 mm intra-pulpal | |||
| / maxillary/ | 2 mm ferrule, 2 mm axial wall and 4 mm intra-pulpal | |||
| / mandibular/ | 2 mm ferrule, butt-joint, and 6mm intra-pulpal | |||
| / maxillary/ | No ferrule and butt joint | |||
| No ferrule, butt joint and 2 mm intra-pulpal | ||||
| No ferrule, butt joint and 4 mm intra-pulpal | ||||
| Ferrule, 5 mm intra-pulpal, 1mm chamfer | ||||
| / mandibular/ | Ferrule with 2.0 mm Preparation Depth | |||
| Ferrule with 4.0 mm Preparation Depth | ||||
| / mandibular/ | 2.0 mm axial wall heights | |||
| 2.0 mm axial wall heights+1.0 mm intra-radicular | ||||
| 2.0 mm axial wall heights+2.0 mm intra-radicular | ||||
| Manual/ Optical/ margins & other areas | Microcomputed tomography | 64±11/ 100±8 | ||
| 87±23/ 104±19 | ||||
| 98±11/ 112±1 | ||||
| 109±14/ 127±1 | ||||
| Milling machine/ Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ | 31.20±6.28 | ||
| 36.53±12.01 | ||||
| 27.58±4.34 | ||||
| 33.63±8.56 | ||||
| Manual/ Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ | 34.61±13.90 | ||
| 29.16±18.05 | ||||
| 26.63±15.93 | ||||
| Manual/ Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ replica technique | 129.06±26.35/ 170.32±53.07/ 216.08±49.96 | ||
| 96.65±19.39/ 147.28±42.60/ 205.43±44.19 | ||||
| 108.99±19.33/ 160.99±30.25/ 223.46±41.38 | ||||
| Manual/Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ | 46.25±21.20 | ||
| Manual/Optical/ | 21.75±11.10 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | 15.94±06.62 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | 13.10±07.08 | |||
| Milling machine/ Optical/ | Digital microscope/ | 25.5±7.04 | ||
| Milling machine/ Optical/ | 31.4±5.89 | |||
| Milling machine/ Optical/ | 54.7±5.79 | |||
| Milling machine/ Optical/ | 60±8.23 | |||
| Manual and Operator/Optical/ | Digital microscope/ | 48.26±10.78 | 59.44±8.08 | |
| 53.12±11.81 | 65.42±12.39 | |||
| 40.1±6.46 | 51.49±8.41 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Digital microscope/ | 7.74±1.55 | ||
| 29.54±6.32 | ||||
| 10.42±3.63 | ||||
| 25.63±12.96 | ||||
| Manual/Optical/ | Microcomputed tomography | 120±27/ 130±37/ 140±43/ 240±58 | ||
| Manual/intraoral scanner/ | 110±24/ 140±54/ 140±52/ 260±59 | |||
| Manual/laboratory scanner/ | 120±29/ 130±33/ 150±44/ 240±64 | |||
| Manual/Conventional/ | 150±35/ 280±70/ 210±76/ 500±150 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ | 56.6±6.1/ 158.2±11.1 | ||
| 81.3±10.1/ 199.1±13.0 | ||||
| Manual/Conventional/ | SEM/ | 122.49±28.37 | ||
| Manual/Optical/ | 71.40±12.87 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | 74.32±14.47 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | 78.68±13.75 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | 80.43±11.65 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Noncontact ATOS scanner | 71.00±31.76/ 77.16±23.78/ 93.91±44.62 | ||
| 69.22±23.49/ 70.18±14.03/ 102.62±26.30 | ||||
| 77.52±13.39/ 73.36±19.86/ 100.04±14.93 | ||||
| Manual/Optical/ | SEM/ | 83.34±16.77 | ||
| Manual/Optical/ | 69.70±10.77 | |||
| Milling machine/Optical/ | Stereomicroscope/ | 36.9±24.4 | 79.9±14.4 | |
| 47.01±26.6 | 77.9±19.5 | |||
| 45.8±16.6 | 73.1±17.1 | |||
| 39.4±17.8 | 75.3±16.7 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Stereomicroscope | 81.5±23.25 | 71.3±0.62 | |
| 87.5±22.44 | 72.5±67.6 | |||
| 93.2±92.82 | 73.4±17.24 | |||
| 93±92.45 | 82.5±32.13 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Microtomography | 163.96±98.0 98.93±66.1 | 207.61±108.04 144.02±76.06 | |
| 182.34±99.76 107.82±82.18 | 190.71±113.96 138.06±95.33 | |||
| Manual/Optical/ | Microtomography | 40.6±4.1/ 65.9±12.1 | ||
| 48.9±13.8/ 76.2±12.0 | ||||
| 59.4±9.6/ 77.6±5.9 | ||||
| Celtra Duo-CAD – machinable zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate glass ceramics; LDGC – lithium disilicate glass ceramics; Celtra-Press – pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium di silicate glass ceramics; VITA Suprinity – zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic; RMC – resin-matrix ceramics; Cerasmar – resin nanoceramics; PEEK – polyetheretherketone; Vita Enamic – polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic; Cerec Blocs – feldspathic ceramic; Lava Ultimate – resin-ceramic; NM – not mentioned; SEM – scanning electron microscopy; μm – micrometer; ±SD – ±standard deviation; AD – axial discrepancy; MD – marginal discrepancy; PD – pulpal discrepancy; MG – marginal gap; ML – marginal leakage. | ||||