Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Yuan Liu; Tianlong Wu; Jianye Tan; Xinxin Miao; Tao Tang; Changxiong Cai; Tao Li; Xiang Luo; Xigao Cheng

doi:10.12659/MSM.943176

19 July 2024 : Clinical Research

Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Yuan Liu^1DE, Tianlong Wu^1BC, Jianye Tan^1B, Xinxin Miao^1B, Tao Tang^1D, Changxiong Cai^1F, Tao Li^1B, Xiang Luo^1B, Xigao Cheng^1234ACG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943176

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943176

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 2 Comparison of ESR and CRP between the 2 groups.

	PELD (n=18)	PLIF (n=22)
Preoperative ESR	85.5±20.4	78.7±23.3
Last follow-up ESR	15.55±9.46^*	14.7±2.7^*
Preoperative CRP	54.3±16.5	61.3±15.1
Last follow-up CRP	9.7±3.4^*	9.5±3.3^*
ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP – C-reactive protein. Compared to preoperative, ^*

Back to the Article

Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Your Privacy