02 July 2024 : Clinical Research
Internal Brace Fixation Technique for Lisfranc Injury: A Retrospective Study
Guanglong Zeng1ABG, Qingxiang Xie1F, Haobo Huang1CE, Limin Cai2DE, Yongcong Li1F, Xinyuan Liang3C, Boyuan Su1G*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943537
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943537
Table 2 Results and comparison of AOFAS, VAS, and Tegner scores at different times among patients (χ̄±s).
| Item | Preoperative (range, 95% CI) | Postoperative 3 months (range, 95% CI) | Postoperative 6 months (range, 95% CI) | Postoperative 1 year (range, 95% CI) | Last follow-up (range, 95% CI) | F | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOFAS | 28.02±6.70 (18–51, 26.26–29.78) | 68.59±5.16 (53–80, 67.23–69.94) | 80.22±4.08 (70–88, 79.15–81.3) | 90.45±3.42 (85–96, 89.55–91.35) | 91.59±4.76 (82–96, 90.34–92.84) | 1209.24 | <0.01 |
| Pain | 19.36±5.8 (10–30, 17.84–20.89) | 27.36±2.1 (21–30, 26.81–27.92) | 31.93±1.66 (28–34, 31.49–32.37) | 36.24±1.41 (34–38, 35.87–36.61) | 36.43±0.24 (32–38, 35.95–36.92) | 322.16 | <0.01 |
| Function | 7.72±3.94 (2–20, 6.69–8.76) | 36.14±2.78 (30–42, 35.41–36.87) | 40.28±2.08 (35–44, 39.73–40.82) | 45.93±1.85 (40–48, 45.44–46.42) | 46.59±2.41 (41–49, 45.95–47.22) | 1193.43 | <0.01 |
| Alignment | 0.93±0.9 (0–2, 0.7–1.17) | 5.09±0.63 (4–7, 4.92–5.25) | 8.02±0.55 (7–9, 7.87–8.16) | 8.28±0.56 (7–10, 8.13–8.42) | 8.71±0.46 (8–9, 8.59–8.83) | 1249.04 | <0.01 |
| VAS | 5.33±1.0 (3–7, 5.07–5.59) | 3.59±0.84 (2–6, 3.37–3.81) | 2.17±0.63 (1–4, 2.01–2.34) | 1.48±0.57 (1–2, 1.33–1.63) | 1.24±0.57 (0–2, 1.09–1.39) | 250.76 | <0.01 |
| Tegner | 2.40±0.67 (1–4, 2.22–2.57) | 4.74±0.79 (4–6, 4.53–4.95) | 5.52±0.66 (4–7, 5.34–5.69) | 6.62±0.56 (6–8, 6.47–6.77) | 6.53±0.54 (6–7, 6.39–6.68) | 564.53 | <0.01 |
| AOFAS – American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score; VAS – visual analog scores. | |||||||