Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 June 2024 : Clinical Research  

Comparison of Fentanyl, Ketamine, and Lidocaine Combined with Propofol Anesthesia in Patients with Crohn Disease Undergoing Colonoscopy

Kamil Chudziński ORCID logo1ABCDEF, Konstanty Szułdrzyński ORCID logo1DEF, Miłosz Jankowski ORCID logo1CDEF, Kamil Adamczyk ORCID logo1EF*, Elżbieta Sokół-Kobielska2DEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944116

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944116

Table 2 Detailed pairwise comparisons between anesthesia groups.

VariableComparison pairsPMean difference (95% CI)
Total propofol dose, mgFNT – KET28.5 (7.9–50.0)
FNT – LID0.28
KET – LID0.3036
Total propofol dose, mg/kg BW/minFNT – KET0.04 (0.02–0.06)
FNT – LID0.0989
KET – LID0.0753
Time to regaining consciousness after anesthesia, sFNT – KET31.2 (5.51–55.66)
FNT – LID46.6 (28.95–66.36)
KET – LID0.2413
Aldrete score, pointsFNT – KET−− −
FNT – LID−− −
KET – LID0.984
PADSS, pointsFNT – KET−0.51 (−0.85 – −0.17)
FNT – LID−0.61 (−0.91 – −0.30)
KET – LID0.965
values were calculated using the Dunn post hoc test. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) are presented. BW – body weight; PADDS – Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System; FNT – fentanyl; KET – ketamine; LID – lidocaine.

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750