Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation

Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoglu; Isa Sozen; İsmail Zihni; Girayhan Celik; Bilal Turan; Serdar Acar; İsa Karaca; Demet Gunduz

doi:10.12659/MSM.944127

29 April 2024 : Clinical Research

Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation

Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoglu^1ABCDEF, Isa Sozen^1AE, İsmail Zihni^1ABF*, Girayhan Celik^1EF, Bilal Turan^2CD, Serdar Acar^3D, İsa Karaca^3BD, Demet Gunduz^4ADE

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944127

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944127

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Characteristics if incontinence complications.

Gender	Age	Type	Wexner score
M	48	Fecal incontinence	2
M	61	Fecal incontinence	3
F	57	Fecal incontinence	3
M	27	Fecal incontinence	12
M	39	Fecal incontinence	3

Back to the Article

Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation

Your Privacy