Impact of Patient Education Formats on Treatment Adherence and Denture Hygiene in Edentulous Patients: A Comparative Study

Youssef Abdullah Algarni; Rashmi S. Gupta; Lakshya Kumar; Khurshid Mattoo; Syed M. Yassin; Mohammad Zahir Kota; Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig; Mohammed Ibrahim; Suheel Manzoor Baba; Shadi Abdullah Hamzi

doi:10.12659/MSM.944175

22 May 2024 : Clinical Research

Impact of Patient Education Formats on Treatment Adherence and Denture Hygiene in Edentulous Patients: A Comparative Study

Youssef Abdullah Algarni^1CDEFG, Rashmi S. Gupta^2ABCEF, Lakshya Kumar^3ABCEF, Khurshid Mattoo^4ACDEF*, Syed M. Yassin^5CDEFG, Mohammad Zahir Kota^6CDEFG, Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig^6CDEG, Mohammed Ibrahim^6CDEFG, Suheel Manzoor Baba^1CDEFG, Shadi Abdullah Hamzi^7BCEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944175

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944175

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 4 Comparative evaluation of average number of instructions of different study groups for 9 different categories of PEM instructions at 2 different post prosthetic rehabilitation time intervals (1 day and 7 days).

Category	Timing	Gp Ve (Verbal)(n=30)		Gp A (Audio)(n=30)		Gp Vi (Video)(n=30)
Category	Timing	Mean±SD	P value	Mean±SD	P value	Mean±SD	P value
I (n=10)	1 D	0.433±0.504	0.040^*	3.233±0.817	0.0168^*	2.367±0.927	0.0022^*
I (n=10)	7 D	0.867±0.507	0.040^*	4.100±1.093	0.0168^*	3.667±1.124	0.0022^*
II (n=5)	1 D	1.00±0.455	0.000^*	2.633±0.490	0.0996	2.300±0.46	0.0037^*
II (n=5)	7 D	1.966±0.668	0.000^*	3.100±0.876	0.0996	3.200±0.664	0.0037^*
III (n=3)	1 D	1.266±0.639	0.004^*	2.333±0.66	0.0100^*	2.267±0.449	0.0045^*
III (n=3)	7 D	1.967±0.490	0.004^*	2.867±0.345	0.0100^*	2.833±0.379	0.0045^*
IV (n=5)	1 D	0.600±0.563	0.007^*	2.533±0.628	0.1608	2.400±0.621	0.0123^*
IV (n=5)	7 D	1.200±0.550	0.007^*	2.800±0.484	0.1608	3.033±0.614	0.0123^*
V (n=10)	1 D	2.533±0.681	0.000^*	5.433±1.072	0.0110^*	5.767±0.678	0.0003^*
V (n=10)	7 D	3.700±0.876	0.000^*	6.567±1.104	0.0110^*	7.600±0.563	0.0003^*
VI (n=5)	1 D	0.167±0.379	0.374	1.100±0.803	0.7078	0.500±0.572	0.0951
VI (n=5)	7 D	0.267±0.449	0.374	1.200±0.484	0.7078	0.800±0.406	0.0951
VII(n=20)	1 D	4.633±1.321	0.000^*	11.500±3.048	0.0072^*	11.600±2.094	0.0001^*
VII(n=20)	7 D	7.467±1.591	0.000^*	13.533±1.525	0.0072^*	14.370±1.245	0.0001^*
VIII (n=6)	1 D	0.200±0.406	0.586	0.500±0.508	0.0226^*	0.433±0.504	0.0209^*
VIII (n=6)	7 D	0.300±0.46	0.586	0.667±0.479	0.0226^*	0.867±0.571	0.0209^*
IX (n=4)	1 D	0.067±0.25	0.325	0.700±0.466	0.0169^*	0.333±0.479	0.4762
IX (n=4)	7 D	0.033±0.182	0.325	0.933±0.253	0.0169^*	0.4333±0.504	0.4762
Gp – group; Ve – verbal/written; A – audio; Vi – video; N – number; % – percentage; M – mean; SD – standard deviation; D – day/days. Category types: I – Nature of prosthesis; II – First oral feeling; III – Sialorrhea-Excess saliva; IV – Speech; V – Mastication; VI – Individuality of patient; VII – Tissue and prosthesis hygiene; VIII – Tongue position; IX – Miscellaneous. Statistical significance: ^* P ^* marks for comparison between first and second appointment.

Back to the Article

Impact of Patient Education Formats on Treatment Adherence and Denture Hygiene in Edentulous Patients: A Comparative Study

Your Privacy