28 May 2024 : Clinical Research
Maxillary Canine Impaction: Assessing the Influence of Maxillary Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Mujgan Firincioglulari
1ABEF*, Doga Kurt2BCDE, Sevgi Koral2ABEF, Kaan Orhan 34ABDE
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944306
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944306
Table 4 Comparison of measurements by groups in terms of side.
| Rightχ̄ (σ) | Leftχ̄ (σ) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palatal width from the cementoenamel junction | 33.51 (2.92) | 33.66 (3.51) | .855 |
| Palatal width from the crest | 31.20 (2.92) | 31.27 (3.29) | .926 |
| Palatal width from mid-root | 29.02 (2.70) | 27.89 (2.49) | .108 |
| Intermolar width | 49.49 (2.88) | 49.93 (3.48) | .593 |
| Palatal depth | 13.55 (2.05) | 14.45 (1.91) | .097 |
| Arch length | 27.63 (2.19) | 28.06 (2.44) | .475 |
| Perimeter | 69.90 (5.39) | 71.61 (5.08) | .223 |
| Width of the nasal cavity | 29.95 (3.09) | 29.45 (3.31) | .557 |