13 June 2024 : Clinical Research
Morphological and Dimensional Analysis of the Nasopalatine Canal: Insights from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in a Large Cohort
Ashraf Mohammed Alhumaidi1ABDE*, Abdulrahman Ahmed Aseri2DFG, Manea Musa M. Alahmari3ACEG, Hafiz Ahmed Adawi4AEG, Khalid Aldhorae56AF, Thrya S. GadahDOI: 10.12659/MSM.944424
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944424
Table 3 Association of sex and age groups with the nasopalatine canal and the adjacent buccal bone plate parameters in mm.
| Variables | Number | IF | SF | Nasopalatine canal length | Mid-level of NPC | M-L IF | Buccal bone plate 1 | Buccal bone plate 2 | Buccal bone plate 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | ||||||||||
| Gender | Male | 142 | 5.25± 1.46 | 2.76± 1.36 | 12.58± 2.45 | 1.87± 0.93 | 3.45± 0.91 | 6.16± 1.45 | 6.32± 1.37 | 7.19± 1.54 |
| Female | 193 | 5.04± 1.43 | 2.44± 1.15 | 11.21± 2.39 | 1.75± 0.86 | 3.04± 0.96 | 5.92± 1.09 | 5.83± 1.14 | 6.65± 1.41 | |
| p-value | 0.194 | 0.033* | 0.000* | 0.224 | 0.000* | 0.011* | 0.000* | 0.001* | ||
| Edentulous | Yes | 10 | 5.53± 1.59 | 2.60± 1.59 | 13.09± 1.85 | 2.09± 0.78 | 4.05± 0.68 | 3.37± 1.49 | 4.22± 1.27 | 5.93± 1.74 |
| No | 325 | 5.12± 1.44 | 2.57± 1.24 | 11.75± 2.51 | 1.79± 0.89 | 3.19± 0.96 | 6.10± 1.16 | 6.09± 1.22 | 6.91± 1.47 | |
| p-value | 0.286 | 0.798 | 0.098 | 0.215 | 0.004* | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.049* | ||
| Age group | 18–35 | 208 | 5.02± 1.46 | 2.50± 1.23 | 11.50± 2.40 | 1.76± 0.90 | 3.06± 0.98 | 6.16± 1.09 | 6.08± 1.23 | 6.82± 1.50 |
| 36–50 | 86 | 5.22± 1.43 | 2.73± 1.34 | 11.78± 2.68 | 1.88± 0.86 | 3.42± 0.90 | 5.90± 1.44 | 5.92± 1.28 | 6.83± 1.44 | |
| ≥51 | 41 | 5.50± 1.37 | 2.61± 1.17 | 13.31± 2.13 | 1.83± 0.892 | 3.57± 0.83 | 5.56± 1.54 | 6.07± 1.43 | 7.33± 1.50 | |
| p-value | 0.023* | 0.569 | 0.001* | 0.305 | 0.000* | 0.001* | 0.338 | 0.171 | ||
| * Statistically significant at level p≤0.05. | ||||||||||






