The Impact of Repeated Steam Sterilization Cycles on the Efficacy of Chairside Adjustment Kits for Polishing Monolithic Multi-Layered Zirconia Dental Restoration Material

Mohammed E. Sayed; Honey Lunkad; Enas Jaber Mohana; Sara Ahmad Mesawa; Fatimah Ibrahim Dowairi; Emad Aldeen A. Alharbi; Hayat Ali Hakami; Hossam F. Jokhadar; Nasser M. Alqahtani; Abdullah Hasan Alshehri; Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy; Saeed M. Alqahtani; Nagam Mohammed Mohsen; Mohammed H.D. Al Wadei; Khurshid Mattoo

doi:10.12659/MSM.944502

10 June 2024 : Animal Research

The Impact of Repeated Steam Sterilization Cycles on the Efficacy of Chairside Adjustment Kits for Polishing Monolithic Multi-Layered Zirconia Dental Restoration Material

Mohammed E. Sayed

^1ABEFG*, Honey Lunkad

^1ABEFG, Enas Jaber Mohana

^2BCDEF, Sara Ahmad Mesawa

^2BCDEF, Fatimah Ibrahim Dowairi

^2BCDEF, Emad Aldeen A. Alharbi

^2BCDEF, Hayat Ali Hakami

^3BCEF, Hossam F. Jokhadar

^4ACDEG, Nasser M. Alqahtani

^5ACDEF, Abdullah Hasan Alshehri

^5CDEFG, Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy

^5CDEFG, Saeed M. Alqahtani

^5ACDEF, Nagam Mohammed Mohsen

^6CDEG, Mohammed H.D. Al Wadei

^7CDEG, Khurshid Mattoo

^1ACDEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944502

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944502

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Tukey hsd (honestly significant difference) post hoc pairwise comparison showing overall differences in the sample means between 2 autoclave cycles (standard, flash) and number of autoclave cycles.

	Sub Groups	Surface roughness (Ra)					Root mean square roughness (Rq)
	Sub Groups	AC1	AC5	AC10	AC15	AC20	AC1	AC5	AC10	AC15	AC20
Standard Cycle (Gp S)	AC1		0.24	0.27	4.23	5.42		4.19	2.83	6.72	1.49
	AC1		0.9937	0.9996	0.0344*	0.0034*		0.0373*	0.2811	0.0002*	0.8283
	AC5	0.24		0.29	4.25	5.44	4.19		7.02	2.53	5.68
	AC5	0.9937		0.9998	0.0333*	0.0033*	0.0373*		0.0001*	0.3913	0.0019*
	AC10	0.27	0.29		3.96	5.15	2.83	7.02		9.55	1.34
	AC10	0.9996	0.9998		0.0551	0.0060*	0.2811	0.0001*		0.0000*	0.8762
	AC15	4.23	4.25	3.96		1.19	6.72	2.53	9.55		8.21
	AC15	0.0344*	0.0333*	0.0551		0.917	0.0002*	0.3913	0.0000*		0.0001*
	AC20	5.42	5.44	5.15	1.19		1.49	5.68	1.34	8.21
	AC20	0.0034*	0.0033*	0.0060*	0.917		0.8283	0.0019*	0.8762	0.0001*
Immediate (Flash) Cycle (Gp F)	AC1		0.63	4.92	3.03	5.14		0.73	2.39	4.45	1.81
	AC1		0.9917	0.0094*	0.2208*	0.0060*		0.9854	0.4512	0.0231*	0.7031
	AC5	0.63		4.29	2.40	4.52	0.73		3.12	5.18	2.54
	AC5	0.9917		0.0308*	0.4451	0.0206*	0.9854		0.1971	0.0056*	0.3876
	AC10	4.92	4.29		1.89	0.22	2.39	3.12		2.07	0.57
	AC10	0.0094*	0.0308*		0.6690	0.9998	0.4512	0.1971		0.5929	0.9940
	AC15	3.03	2.40	1.89		2.11	4.45	5.18	2.07		2.64
	AC15	0.2208*	0.4451	0.6690		0.5713	0.0231*	0.0056*	0.5929		0.3499
	AC20	5.14	4.52	0.22	2.11		1.81	2.54	0.57	2.64
	AC20	0.0060*	0.0206	0.9998	0.5713		0.7031	0.3876	0.9940	0.3499
AC – autoclave cycles; Gp S – standard autoclaved groups; Gp F – immediate/flash autoclaved groups; 1,5,10,15,20 – number of autoclave cycles. Ra (average roughness) – measurement of the deviation of a surface from a mean height; Rq – root mean square roughness (applicable to thickness required to create smoothness; Test employed – Tukey’s HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs of means differ significantly. Statistical significance – All differences at various time intervals in each group were considered to be statistically significant if the probable P value was ≤0.05.

Back to the Article

The Impact of Repeated Steam Sterilization Cycles on the Efficacy of Chairside Adjustment Kits for Polishing Monolithic Multi-Layered Zirconia Dental Restoration Material

Your Privacy