Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

12 November 2024 : Clinical Research  

Iliac Periosteal Bone Autografting vs Talus Non-Weight-Bearing Surgery in Hepple V Talus Osteochondral Injuries: Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes

Liu Lin12AB, Zengyue Zhu23B*, Heda Liu12DE, Yingli Li12DEG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944912

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944912

Table 1 Comparison of general data, preoperative pain level, and ankle joint function.

Group (mean±SD)/(%)χ2/tEffectP
Iliac periosteal bone autograft group (n=82)Talus non-weight-bearing group (n=80)
Sex (Male)48 (58.54)37 (46.25)2.4510.1230.117
Side (right)51 (62.20)40 (50.00)2.4460.1230.118
Causes (sports injuries)61 (74.39)57 (71.25)0.2020.0350.653
Age (years)44.95±10.3144.59±9.930.2290.0360.819
BMI (kg/m)23.47±3.1923.70±3.63−0.436−0.0670.663
Follow-up time (months)23.74±5.0624.59±4.12−1.162−0.1840.247
Onset time (months)37.22±8.1938.73±6.11−1.328−0.2090.186
Preoperative VAS score4.62±0.734.46±0.861.2760.2010.204
AOFAS score before surgery74.68±8.3272.83±10.041.2840.2010.201
Preoperative plantar flexion range of motion (°)21.68±2.8121.63±2.880.1290.0180.897
Preoperative extension range of motion (°)17.43±2.2817.36±2.480.1720.0290.864
BMI – body mass index; VAS – visual analog scale; AOFAS score – ankle-hindfoot scoring system score.

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750