05 September 2024 : Clinical Research
Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Responses and Oropharyngeal Complications in Tracheal Intubation: Evaluating Conventional, Video, and Rigid Video Laryngoscopes Under General Anesthesia
Liyu Wang1ACE, Hui Li1B, Yanni Zhong1B, Sanchun Ye1F, Jingjing Deng1C, Ting Pan1C, Yuenong Zhang1A*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944916
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944916
Table 1 General information and comparison of intubation and extubation time among 3 groups.
| Indicators | Group | F/Chi-square value | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (n=80) | B (n=80) | C (n=80) | |||
| Age (age) | 48.8±14.4 | 50.6±14.6 | 51.8±12.4 | 0.963 | 0.383 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 39/41 | 45/35 | 42/38 | 0.902 | 0.637 |
| Smoking history (with/without) | 68/12 | 68/12 | 62/18 | 2.078 | 0.354 |
| BMI | 22.9±3.4 | 22.9±2.6 | 23.2±3.1 | 0.218 | 0.804 |
| ASA grade (I/II) | 11/19 | 13/17 | 12/18 | 0.278 | 0.870 |
| Mallampati grade (I/II/III) | 58.3±14.8 | 57.4±16.8 | 60.3±13.5 | 0.485 | 0.629 |
| Dosage of sufentanil (μg) | 32.1±8.2 | 33.2±8.0 | 34.1±7.9 | 1.421 | 0.182 |
| Intubation time (min) | 175.0±73.3 | 167.3±59.1 | 187.7±68.6 | 1.863 | 0.158 |
| A – Ordinary laryngoscope; B – Video laryngoscope; C – rigid video laryngoscope. Intubation time: The time from the tracheal tube insertion to its removal. | |||||