Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Responses and Oropharyngeal Complications in Tracheal Intubation: Evaluating Conventional, Video, and Rigid Video Laryngoscopes Under General Anesthesia

05 September 2024 : Clinical Research

Liyu Wang^1ACE, Hui Li^1B, Yanni Zhong^1B, Sanchun Ye^1F, Jingjing Deng^1C, Ting Pan^1C, Yuenong Zhang^1A*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944916

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944916

Table 2 Comparison of hemodynamic indicators in patients at different time points among the 3 groups.

Indicators	Time point	Group A (n=80)	Group B (n=80)	Group C (n=80)
SBP (mmHg)	T0	128.8±18.9	130.2±18.0	131.2±18.5
	T1	143.2±28.3^a	148.5±27.4^a	140.5±28.0^a
	T2	116.1±15.9,^a	116.4±17.4,^a	116.6±16.1,^a
DBP (mmHg)	T0	76.9±11.1	76.8±10.3	78.8±11.6
	T1	88.9±16.3^a	85.8±18.0^a	86.4±17.2^a
	T2	70.7±12.6,^a	70.0±12.6,^a	70.8±11.6,^a
MAP (mmHg)	T0	94.0±13.1	95.2±14.5	96.5±14.1
	T1	107.1±18.7^a	102.9±21.1^a	103.4±20.3^a
	T2	85.3±13.9,^a	84.9±14.6,^a	85.7±13.2,^a
HR (time/min)	T0	74.6±12.2	72.7±12.2	72.1±12.6
	T1	94.0±17.1^a	87.5±16.4,^a	86.8±20.1,^a
	T2	66.7±12.8,^a	65.8±12.8,^a	63.5±12.4,^a
Compared with T, ^a ^b ^c A – ordinary laryngoscope; B – video laryngoscope; C – rigid video laryngoscope.