30 September 2024 : Clinical Research
Comparative Impact of Core Stabilization vs Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Exercises on Muscle Activation, Endurance, and Balance in Obese Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Selma Uzuner Kızılkaya1ABDEFG*, Emine Handan Tüzün1ADEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.945669
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e945669
Table 5 Effect sizes of McGill core endurance. lumbar spine position sense. and static and dynamic balance test results (Cohen d).
| Variables | Evaluation times | Effect size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSE group | PNF group | Control group | |||
| Flexor | BT-AT | 1.11 | 0.81 | 0.09 | |
| AT-F | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.02 | ||
| BT-F | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.12 | ||
| Extensor | BT-AT | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.07 | |
| AT-F | 0.44 | 0.17 | 0.01 | ||
| BT-F | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.08 | ||
| Dominant side lateral bridge | BT-AT | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.11 | |
| AT-F | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.04 | ||
| BT-F | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | ||
| Non-dominant side lateral bridge | BT-AT | 0.58 | 0.38 | 0.07 | |
| AT-F | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.03 | ||
| BT-F | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.04 | ||
| BT-AT | 0.74 | ||||
| AT-F | 0.73 | 0.02 | |||
| BT-F | 0.74 | ||||
| Eyes open | BT-AT | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.07 | |
| AT-F | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.01 | ||
| BT-F | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.06 | ||
| Eyes closed | BT-AT | 0.73 | 0.41 | 0.18 | |
| AT-F | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.01 | ||
| BT-F | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.18 | ||
| Right mixed reach distance | BT-AT | 0.51 | 0.23 | 0.06 | |
| AT-F | 0.34 | 0.14 | 0.01 | ||
| BT-F | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.05 | ||
| Left mixed reach distance | BT-AT | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.04 | |
| AT-F | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.01 | ||
| BT-F | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.04 | ||
| CSE – core stabilization exercise; PNF – proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation; C – control; BT – before treatment; AT – after treatment; F – follow-up. | |||||






