23 December 2024 : Clinical Research
Evaluation of IMPALA 2.0: Addressing Patient Monitoring in Low-Resource Hospitals in Malawi
Lezzie Douglas Chirambo
12ABCDEF*, Atupele Ngina Mulaga1ACDEF, Adamson Thengolose1ACE, Alick Onesimus Vweza2AEFG, Bart Laurens Bierling3ADEF, IMPALA Study Team, Job Calis 456DEG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945856
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e945856
Table 1 Descriptive statistics on perceived usability for the study groups.
| Participant groups | Variables | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinicians (n=3) | Usefulness | 8.71 | 1.48 | 7.00 | 9.63 |
| Ease of use | 5.42 | 0.89 | 4.75 | 6.42 | |
| Ease of learning | 5.67 | 1.53 | 4.00 | 7.00 | |
| Satisfaction | 7.33 | 0.44 | 7.00 | 7.83 | |
| Clinical nurses (n=15) | Usefulness | 9.18 | 0.70 | 7.63 | 10.00 |
| Ease of use | 7.86 | 1.37 | 4.92 | 10.00 | |
| Ease of learning | 7.78 | 1.48 | 5.50 | 10.00 | |
| Satisfaction | 8.67 | 1.18 | 6.33 | 10.00 | |
| Research nurses (n=6) | Usefulness | 9.21 | 0.97 | 7.5 | 10.00 |
| Ease of use | 8.11 | 0.65 | 7.00 | 8.75 | |
| Ease of learning | 9.04 | 0.78 | 8.25 | 10.00 | |
| Satisfaction | 8.58 | 1.14 | 6.50 | 10.00 |