20 November 2024 : Clinical Research
Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia
Bircan Alan
1ABCDEFG*, Safiye Gurel 1BCEF
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946207
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e946207
Table 2 Comparison of quantitative variables in the survival and non-survival groups.
| CT parameters | Survivor group | Non-survivor group | P* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 68.2±12 | 80.1±6 | 0.002 |
| CeT diameter, mm | 6.3±1 | 5±1 | 0.010 |
| SMA diameter, mm | 5.2±1 | 4.5±1 | 0.035 |
| SMV diameter, mm | 9.3±2 | 5.6±3 | <0.001 |
| IVC diameter, mm | 15.6±2 | 7.1±1 | <0.001 |
| IMA diameter, mm | 2.6±0.8 | 1.9±0.8 | 0.008 |
| SMV/SMA ratio | 1.5±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.968 |
| Bowel wall arterial phase density, HU | 33.2±14 | 19.3±8 | 0.002 |
| Bowel wall portal venous phase density, HU | 51.5±21 | 52±29 | 0.056 |
| Delta HU | 16±10 | 9.2±4 | 0.027 |
| Values are described as mean±SD. * test. CeT – celiac trunk; SMA – superior mesenteric artery; SMV – superior mesenteric vein; IVC – inferior vena cava; IMA – inferior mesenteric artery; HU – Hounsfield unit. | |||