13 November 2024 : Clinical Research
Impact of Different Orthodontic Appliances on Mandibular Condyle, Anterior Region of Mandibular, and Maxillary Sinus Using Panoramic Radiography
Betul Yuzbasioglu Ertugrul
1ABCDEFG*
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946265
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e946265
Table 3 Mandibular condyle head bone formation changes before and after orthodontic treatment with Removable Functional Appliances.
| Rigth mandibular condyle head bone formation before orthodontic treatment | Left mandibular condyle head bone formation before orthodontic treatment | Average mandibular condyle head bone formation before orthodontic treatment | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 13310±86 | 13330±78 | 13320±82 | (P<0.05) |
| Group B | 13360±74 | 13610±30 | 13480±52 | (P>0.05) |
| Group C | 13090±14 | 13190±79 | 13140±39 | (P>0.05) |
| Group D | 13180±10 | 13390±99 | 13230±44 | (P>0.05) |
| Group A | 13330±92 | 13890±59 | 13610±76 | (P<0.05) |
| Group B | 13610±30 | 13450±84 | 13580±57 | (P>0.05) |
| Group C | 13190±79 | 13380±68 | 13290±74 | (P>0.05) |
| Group D | 13520±84 | 13500±52 | 13330±78 | (P>0.05) |
| Group A: maxillary expansion appliance; Group B: twinblock/monoblock appliances; Group C: face mask appliances; Group D: chincup appliances. 0.05 indicates statistically significant difference. * The group is statistically significantly different from the others. | ||||