08 December 2024 : Laboratory Research
Accuracy of 3 Intraoral Scanners in Recording Impressions for Full Arch Dental Implant-Supported Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study
Saurabh Jain![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
![ORCID logo](https://jours.isi-science.com/images/id_icon_32.png)
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946624
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e946624
Table 4 Post hoc comparisons between different intraoral scanners.
Comparison | Mean difference | SE | df | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIOS 5 vs Medit i700 | −2.76 | 2.82 | 24 | −0.98 | 0.596 |
TRIOS 5 vs Primescan | −11.24 | 2.82 | 24 | −3.991 | 0.002* |
Medit i700 vs Primescan | −8.48 | 2.82 | 24 | −3.011 | 0.016* |
TRIOS 5 vs Medit i700 | −5.65 | 4.82 | 27 | −1.17 | 0.479 |
TRIOS 5 vs Primescan | −17.45 | 4.82 | 27 | −3.62 | 0.003* |
Medit i700 vs Primescan | −11.80 | 4.82 | 27 | −2.45 | 0.053 |
F – variation between sample means/variation within the samples; df – degree of freedom; t – statistical representation of Tukey post hoc test. Test used: Tukey honestly significant difference test (HSD). Significant levels: * All differences considered to be statistically significant if value is equal to or less than 0.05. |