11 January 2025 : Clinical Research
Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study
Satish VishwanathaiahDOI: 10.12659/MSM.946802
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e946802
Table 3 Comparison of various parameters (ordinal data) during caries removal using smart and carbide burs.
| SI. No | Parameters | Carbide burs[Median(Q1,Q3)] | Smart burs[Median(Q1,Q3)] | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ericson Scale | 0 (0, 0.25) | 1 (0, 1) | 0.047* |
| 2 | FBRS | |||
| Before anesthesia | 3 (3, 4) | 3 (3, 3.25) | 0.506 | |
| During anesthesia | 2 (2, 3) | 3 (3, 3) | 0.059 | |
| After anesthesia | 3 (3, 3) | 3 (3, 3) | 0.353 | |
| 3 | FLACC Scale | 4.5 (2, 5.25) | 1 (1, 2) | <0.001** |
| 4 | WBS | |||
| During excavation | 6 (6, 8) | 2 (2, 4) | <0.001** | |
| During restoration | 2 (2, 2.5) | 0 (0, 0.5) | <0.001** | |
| At the end of treatment | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 0.573 | |
| * Significant at 0.05 level; ** Significant at 0.001 level. FBR – Frankel Behavior Rating scale, FLACC – Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability scale; WBS – Wong Baker Scale. | ||||






