03 April 2025 : Review article
Current Strategies for Managing Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma in Children and Adolescents
Aneta MichalczewskaDOI: 10.12659/MSM.947277
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947277
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, and limitations of various methods of radiological imaging of PPGL [21,28,37,51].
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | 76% () | ||
| Computed tomography (CT) | Small tumors: 90–92%.Big tumors: 100% ()90% ()88–100% () | 93% () | |
| Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | 93.3% ()Head and neck paragangliomas: 90–95% () | 93% () | |
| [I]-MIBG | 75–90% ()90.6% ()Pheochromocytomas: 85–88%.Paragangliomas: 56–75% () | 100% ()100% ()Pheochromocytomas: 70–100%.Paragangliomas: 84–100% () | |
| [F]-FDG PET | 74–100% ()66–78% () | ||
| [Ga]-DODATATE PET | 72–100% () | ||
| CT – computed tomography; MRI – magnetic resonance imaging; PPGL – pheo-chromocytoma and paraganglioma; MIBG – metaiodobenzylguanidine; FDG – fluorodeoxyglucose; FDOPA – fluorodihydroxy phenylalanine; DOTATATE – DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate; PET – positron emission tomography. | |||






