22 July 2025 : Clinical Research
Hemodynamic Insights into Preeclampsia: Comparing Ophthalmic and Uterine Artery Resistive Indices
Maya Khaerunnisa Puspitasari ABCDEFG 1*, Amillia Siddiq ADEF 1, Rova Virgana
ADEF 2, Akhmad Yogi Pramatirta ABDEFG 1, Setyorini Irianti ACDEF 1, Budi Handono ADE 1, Johanes Cornelius Mose ADE 1, Jusuf Sulaeman Effendi ADE 1
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947528
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947528
Table 3 Pulsatility index, resistive index, and peak ratio Doppler values of the ophthalmic artery in the 2 groups.
| Variable | Group | 95% CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Preeclampsia | |||
| Ophthalmic artery | ||||
| PI mean | 2.00±0.45 | 1.40±0.25 | −0.75 to −0.37 | ,a |
| RI mean | 0.79±0.08 | 0.60±0.08 | −0.23 to −0.14 | ,a |
| PR () | 0.52±0.12 | 0.75±0.12 | 0.17 to 0.30 | ,a |
| PSV1 | 42.49 (12.09–141.1) | 68.57 (9.89–533.8) | 31.32 to 105.10 | 0.43,b |
| For numerical data, the value was tested using an independent test if the data were normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney test if the data were not normally distributed. For categorical data, the value was calculated using the chi-square test, with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Fisher Exact test as alternatives if the assumptions for the chi-square test were not met. Statistical significance was determined at a Independent -test; b Mann-Whitney test. PI – pulsatility index; RI – resistance index; PR – peak ratio. | ||||