Analysis of Strabismus Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 2269 Cases from a Single Center

21 July 2025 : Clinical Research

Haidong Wu^{ABCE 1}, Hu Liu^{BCEF 2*}

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947601

Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947601

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 6 Distribution of surgical methods.

Surgical method	2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		chi-square	P
Surgical method	N	%	N	%	N	%	N	%	N	%	N	%	N	%	chi-square	P
Bilateral lateral rectus recession	29	22.66	99	49.01	112	52.58	61	45.19	81	54.73	104	61.90	101	62.35	60.639	<0.001
Bilateral medial rectus recession	13	10.16	18	8.91	33	15.49	22	16.30	23	15.54	15	8.93	27	16.67	11.551	0.073
Unilateral lateral rectus recession + medial rectus shortening/folding	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	–	–
Bilateral medial rectus shortening/folding	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	–	–
Unilateral lateral rectus recession + medial rectus shortening/folding	64	50	55	27.23	40	18.78	34	25.19	27	18.24	15	8.93	12	7.41	103.729	<0.001
Unilateral medial rectus recession + lateral rectus shortening/folding	10	7.81	15	7.43	8	3.76	5	3.70	5	3.38	10	5.95	7	4.32	6.771	0.343
Bilateral lateral rectus recession + unilateral medial rectus shortening/folding	12	9.38	14	6.93	20	9.39	12	8.89	12	8.11	19	11.31	13	8.02	2.547	0.863
Bilateral medial rectus recession + unilateral lateral rectus shortening/folding	0	0	1	0.50	0	0	1	0.74	0	0	5	2.98	2	1.23	9.929	0.024
Total	128		202		213		135		148		168		162

Back to the Article