03 July 2025 : Database Analysis
Can ChatGPT Provide Patient-Friendly and Reliable Information on Cervical Cancer Screening? A Study of ChatGPT-Generated Information in Polish
Adriana A. Michalska ABCDEF 1, Małgorzata M. StefaniakDOI: 10.12659/MSM.947992
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947992
Table 5 Expert reviewers’ overall assessment of the quality of the MICC-GPTs.
| Rating summary* | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | Reviewer 3 | Reviewer 4 | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| 1 – The response completely fails to meet the criterion | 15 | 5% | 51 | 17% | 18 | 6% | 0 | 0 | 84 | 7% |
| 2 – The response does not meet the criterion | 56 | 19% | 113 | 38% | 31 | 10% | 22 | 7% | 222 | 18% |
| 3 – I have no opinion | 1 | 0.34% | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4% | 1 | 0.34% | 15 | 1% |
| 4 – The response meets the criterion | 103 | 35% | 55 | 18% | 61 | 20% | 156 | 53% | 375 | 31% |
| 5 – The response perfectly meets the criterion | 119 | 40% | 75 | 25% | 171 | 58% | 115 | 39% | 480 | 40% |
| Total score | 296 | 100% | 296 | 100% | 296 | 100% | 296 | 100% | 1176 | 100% |
| * Analysis of all criteria in total. | ||||||||||






