26 May 2025 : Clinical Research
Use of the Zebris Ultrasonic Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis System to Evaluate Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine in 61 Healthy Adults
Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda
ABCDEF 1*, Agnieszka Grzybowska ABF 2, Andrzej Maciejczak DF 3,4, Paweł Kiper ABD 5, Sara Federico ABD 5, Agnieszka Guzik ABF 1
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.948203
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e948203
Table 5 ICC results for comparisons between the raters, and between the measurements performed by the same rater.
| Between raters | rICC | Between measurements | rICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexion 1A vs 2A | 0.9915 | Flexion 1A vs 1B | 0.9855 |
| Flexion 1B vs 2B | 0.9921 | Flexion 2A vs 2B | 0.9915 |
| Extension 1A vs 2A | 0.9912 | Extension 1A vs 1B | 0.9881 |
| Extension 1B vs 2B | 0.9909 | Extension 2A vs 2B | 0.9851 |
| Rotation L 1A vs 2A | 0.9793 | Rotation L 1A vs 1B | 0.9760 |
| Rotation L 1B vs 2B | 0.9754 | Rotation L 2A vs 2B | 0.9675 |
| Rotation R 1A vs 2A | 0.9857 | Rotation R 1A vs 1B | 0.9781 |
| Rotation R 1B vs 2B | 0.9887 | Rotation R 2A vs 2B | 0.9879 |
| Side bend L 1A vs 2A | 0.9834 | Side bend L 1A vs 1B | 0.9835 |
| Side bend L 1B vs 2B | 0.9830 | Side bend L 2A vs 2B | 0.9790 |
| Side bend R 1A vs 2A | 0.9888 | Side bend R 1A vs 1B | 0.9827 |
| Side bend R 1B vs 2B | 0.9887 | Side bend R 2A vs 2B | 0.9884 |
| r – intraclass correlation coefficients. | |||