19 May 2025 : Laboratory Research
Impact of Margin Type and Material Choice on Stress Distribution in Endocrown Restorations: A 3D Finite Element Study
Kulashekar Reddy NandalurDOI: 10.12659/MSM.948308
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e948308
Table 3 Distribution of groups according to material type and preparation characteristics (margins, occlusal thickness, and pulpal extension) of the total von Mises stresses (Mpa) measured in tooth components and endocrown restoration.
| Model | Design features | Material | Enamel | Dentin | Root | Endocrown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | M – Flat ButtPCE – 2 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 17.59 | 13.86 | 24.93 | 23.40 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 17.54 | 13.56 | 24.95 | 20.96 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 22.96 | 10.62 | 25.18 | 19.80 | ||
| B | M – Flat ButtPCE – 4 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 13.81 | 5.75 | 24.16 | 30.30 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 14.37 | 4.80 | 24.40 | 23.03 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 21.96 | 8.75 | 25.46 | 20.31 | ||
| C | M – 20° bevelPCE – 2 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 17.67 | 12.69 | 23.41 | 22.75 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 17.06 | 12.74 | 23.93 | 19.76 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 25.14 | 9.27 | 24.04 | 18.57 | ||
| D | M – 20° bevelPCE – 4 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 14.04 | 4.80 | 24.40 | 29.61 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 15.07 | 5.01 | 24.05 | 21.99 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 23.28 | 9.04 | 25.13 | 19.97 | ||
| E | M – ShoulderPCE – 2 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 19.91 | 13.97 | 24.30 | 28.86 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 20.18 | 10.12 | 24.34 | 26.87 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 27.99 | 9.42 | 24.72 | 19.18 | ||
| F | M – ShoulderPCE – 4 mmOT – 3 mm | In-Ceram Zirconia | 18.22 | 5.82 | 23.14 | 32.04 |
| IPS e.max CAD | 18.71 | 6.00 | 23.41 | 23.07 | ||
| Grandio blocs | 27.34 | 8.99 | 24.62 | 20.55 | ||
| M – margin type; PCE – pulp chamber extension; OT – occlusal thickness; CAD – computer assisted/aided diagnosis. Model descriptions: model A = flat butt margin +2 mm PCE +3 mm OT; model B = flat butt margin +4 mm PCE +3 mm OT; model C = 20° bevel margin +2 mm PCE +3 mm OT; model D = 20° bevel +4 mm PCE +3 mm OT; model E = shoulder margin +2 mm PCE +3 mm OT; model F = shoulder margin +4 mm PCE +3 mm OT. | ||||||






