Comparison of Fracture Resistance Based on Ferrule Presence vs Material Type in Maxillary Central Incisor Endocrown Restorations

20 October 2025 : Laboratory Research

Serap Sasa^{ABCDEFG 1*}, Köksal Beydemir^{AEG 2}

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.949592

Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e949592

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Differences between groups in terms of fracture resistance values.

	Fracture resistance (N)						Kruskal-Wallis H test
	n	Mean	Median	Min	Max	Sd	Mean rank	H	P
Ferrule (+) e max	10	534.1	517.23	407.947	842.946	131.29	25.7	12.391	0.001^*
Ferrule (+) Celtra Duo	10	588.35	587.37	377.823	890.186	169.12	27.6
Ferrule (−) e max	10	365.38	362.84	133.279	659.313	150.10	11.5
Ferrule (−) Celtra Duo	10	425.87	433.37	289.753	527.395	85.21	17.2
Total	40	478.43	464.78	133.279	890.186	159.16	Ferrule (−) e max-Ferrule (+) e maxFerrule (−) e max-Ferrule (+) Celtra Duo
^* Statistically significant.

Back to the Article