09 February 2026 : Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture for Pain Alleviation in Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hao Wang AB 1, Wenjie Chen DF 1, Guangyou Chen AB 1*, Kai Zhu D 1, Kaiquan Zhang BC 1, Dongdong Li F 1, Yang Lei B 1DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951091
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e951091
Table 3 Subgroup analysis results.
| Subgroup | VAS at rest( 3 days post-operation) | VAS at rest (7 days post-operation) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | MD [95% CI] | P value | I2 | Study | MD [95% CI] | P value | I2 | ||
| Total | 12 | 11 | |||||||
| Interventions | Combination of exercise | 8 | −0.95 [−1.22, −0.68] | P=0.0003 | 74% | 9 | −0.53 [−0.80, −0.26] | P=0.0001 | 90% |
| Non-exercise | 4 | −0.77 [−1.20,−0.35] | P=0.0004 | 78% | 2 | −0.65 [−1.06, −0.24] | P=0.002 | 0% | |
| Acupoints selection | On the affected side | 10 | −0.92 [−1.15, −0.68] | P<0.00001 | 76% | 9 | −0.52 [−0.76, −0.27] | P<0.0001 | 88% |
| On the healthy side | 2 | −0.72 [−1.32, −0.13] | P=0.02 | 54% | 2 | −0.47 [−1.37, −0.43] | P=0.31 | 50% | |
| Sample size | n<60 | 5 | −0.80 [−0.96, −0.65] | P<0.00001 | 34% | 6 | −0.59 [−0.79, −0.40] | P<0.00001 | 72% |
| n≥60 | 7 | −0.94 [−1.28, −0.60] | P<0.00001 | 81% | 5 | −0.38 [−0.52, −0.25] | P<0.00001 | 0% | |
| Duration of treatment (by days) | ≤7 days | 8 | −0.92 [−1.20, −0.64] | P<0.00001 | 78% | 5 | −0.50 [−0.63, −0.37] | P<0.00001 | 0% |
| >7 days | 4 | −0.82 [−1.21, −0.44] | P<0.0001 | 65% | 6 | −0.60 [−0.86, −0.35] | P<0.00001 | 75% | |
| VAS – visual assessment scale; MD – mean difference; CI – confidence interval. | |||||||||






