Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

30 June 2026 : Review article  

Muscle-Specific Differences in Neuromuscular Block and Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Narrative Review

Paweł Radkowski ORCID logo ABCDEFG 1,2,3, Dawid Kamil Malicki ORCID logo BCDEF 4, Florian Trachte ORCID logo CDEF 5,6, Hubert Oniszczuk ORCID logo CDEF 7*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951168

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e951168

Table 3 Comparison of facial and peripheral monitoring sites: relationship to laryngeal adductor behavior and clinical interpretation.

Muscle monitoredCorrelation with laryngeal adductor musclesOnset of blockade vs adductor pollicisResistance to NMBAsRecovery vs adductor pollicisReversal characteristicsMain clinical role
Corrugator superciliiStrongLater onsetHigher resistanceFaster recoveryLower dose of sugammadex sufficient (eg, ~2 mg/kg)Best facial predictor of intubating conditions
Orbicularis oculiModerateEarlier onsetModerate resistanceFaster recoveryTOF=1.0 may occur with residual blockUseful for onset only; unsafe for extubation
Adductor pollicisPoor (airway muscles)ReferenceLower resistanceSlowest recoveryRequires higher reversal dosesGold standard for recovery and extubation
NMBA – neuromuscular blocking agent; TOF – train-of-four. Correlation with laryngeal adductor muscles primarily refers to similarity in onset and early recovery of neuromuscular blockade. Recovery at facial sites occurs earlier than recovery at peripheral muscles and does not reliably reflect restoration of pharyngeal or airway-protective muscle function. A TOF ratio of 1.0 measured at the orbicularis oculi does not exclude residual neuromuscular weakness.

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750