17 March 2026 : Review article
Application and Research Progress of BCI in Post-Stroke Psychiatric Disorders: A Narrative Review
Zekai HuDOI: 10.12659/MSM.951399
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e951399
Table 1 Comparison of different BCI modalities.
| BCI type | Signal acquisition | Invasiveness | Key advantages | Limitations | Typical applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive | Scalp EEG, fNIRS | None | High safety, portability, low cost, easy setup | Low spatial resolution, susceptible to noise/artifacts | Cognitive monitoring, neurofeedback, stroke rehabilitation [,]29 |
| Semi-invasive | ECoG (cortical surface) | Moderate | Better spatial/temporal resolution than EEG; lower risk than intracortical | Surgical risks (infection); limited coverage area | Epilepsy presurgical mapping, precise motor control []44 |
| Invasive | Intracortical microelectrodes | High | Highest signal fidelity; detects single-neuron activity | Tissue damage, biocompatibility issues, signal degradation over time | Advanced prosthetic control, communication for locked-in patients [,]45 |
| BCI – brain computer interface; EEG – electroencephalography; fNIRS – functional near-infrared spectroscopy; ECoG – electrocorticography. | |||||






